From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27773 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2017 12:06:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27753 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jul 2017 12:06:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.suse.de Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:06:45 +0000 Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BE1ADAA; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:06:00 -0000 From: Torsten Duwe To: Maxim Kuvyrkov Cc: Richard Biener , Jan Hubicka , "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" , Sandra Loosemore , Marek Polacek , GCC Patches , Szabolcs Nagy , nd@arm.com, Li Bin , Jiri Kosina , Marcus Shawcroft , Takahiro Akashi , Andrew Wafaa Subject: Re: [PATCH v12] add -fpatchable-function-entry=N,M option Message-ID: <20170720120641.GB29907@suse.de> References: <20170706140311.GA20710@suse.de> <20170707193028.GA17752@suse.de> <20170717121046.GA22056@suse.de> <09075950-0C9D-4B43-B9BB-971A0F57B03E@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <09075950-0C9D-4B43-B9BB-971A0F57B03E@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg01225.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 01:58:06PM +0300, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > > On Jul 17, 2017, at 3:10 PM, Torsten Duwe wrote: > > > > What is the next step now? Is anybody going to commit that patch? > > Torsten, if you prefer I can commit your patch (after bootstrap and a regtest on aarch64-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu). Ok, who is going to do that? > There is one last hurdle to sort out with the FSF copyright assignment. Looking at FSF's list I don't see SuSe's copyright assignment for your contributions to FSF projects, of which GCC is one. You can either request SuSe to file a copyright assignment for you, or, probably simpler, ask one of your SuSe colleagues (Richard B., Jan H.) to commit under their assignment. >From my understanding, it should not make a difference, as the copyright owner is identical (SUSE). But I'm not going to argue on legal issues here. Let's first see what the test outcome is. Thanks so far! Torsten