From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 68089 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2017 11:46:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 62947 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jul 2017 11:45:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-HELO: nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz Received: from nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (HELO nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.20.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:45:48 +0000 Received: by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 16202) id E2B5D548C6E; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:45:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:46:00 -0000 From: Jan Hubicka To: Martin =?iso-8859-2?Q?Li=B9ka?= Cc: Richard Biener , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bound partial-inlining-entry-probability param (PR ipa/80663). Message-ID: <20170727114544.GB51167@kam.mff.cuni.cz> References: <2f282165-32ab-ceb6-d9d8-50d7e8832745@suse.cz> <29b2d4e9-8603-2f64-29ce-b4510a55a4bc@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <29b2d4e9-8603-2f64-29ce-b4510a55a4bc@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg01796.txt.bz2 > On 05/26/2017 10:54 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Martin Li¹ka wrote: > >> Hello. > >> > >> Having value of parameter partial-inlining-entry-probability bigger than 100 does not > >> make sense and can be just used to artificially trigger partial inlining. > >> > >> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests. > >> > >> Ready to be installed? > > > > Ok. > > Hello. > > In order to fix PR81576, may I install the same patch to active branches? OK, Honza > > Thanks, > Martin > > > > >> Martin