From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 49793 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2017 10:51:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 49779 invoked by uid 89); 7 Aug 2017 10:51:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 10:51:02 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v77Aop5t014260; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 05:50:52 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id v77Aokvj014253; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 05:50:46 -0500 Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 10:51:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Bill Schmidt , GCC Patches , jakub@redhat.com, David Edelsohn Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Clean up capitalized diagnostic messages Message-ID: <20170807105045.GE13471@gate.crashing.org> References: <9a2980f0-01ed-1474-c4a2-f743695d60f8@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <8760e1dsp4.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8760e1dsp4.fsf@linux-m68k.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-08/txt/msg00492.txt.bz2 Hi Andreas, On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 10:08:23AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-2.c (test for errors, line 18) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-2.c (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-5.c (test for errors, line 18) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-5.c (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-sig-2.c (test for errors, line 16) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-sig-2.c (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-sig-5.c (test for errors, line 16) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-sig-5.c (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-11.c (test for errors, line 20) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-11.c (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-2.c (test for errors, line 20) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-2.c (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-5.c (test for errors, line 20) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-5.c (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-8.c (test for errors, line 20) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-8.c (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/cmpb-3.c (test for errors, line 12) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/cmpb-3.c (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/byte-in-set-2.c (test for errors, line 15) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/byte-in-set-2.c (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vsu/vec-xl-len-13.c (test for errors, line 17) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vsu/vec-xl-len-13.c (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vsu/vec-xst-len-13.c (test for errors, line 18) > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vsu/vec-xst-len-13.c (test for excess errors) What target? What configure options? What runtest options? What binutils version? What is the actual CPU? Or, do you have a link to a gcc-testresults post with that info? Segher