From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-460183-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 74834 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2017 13:46:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74539 invoked by uid 89); 10 Aug 2017 13:46:10 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-24.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_0,GIT_PATCH_1,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: gate.crashing.org
Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:46:09 +0000
Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v7ADk3gt020231;	Thu, 10 Aug 2017 08:46:04 -0500
Received: (from segher@localhost)	by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id v7ADk1xu020228;	Thu, 10 Aug 2017 08:46:01 -0500
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 14:09:00 -0000
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,        Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] fold-vec testcase fix-ups
Message-ID: <20170810134554.GB13471@gate.crashing.org>
References: <1502371637.6577.48.camel@brimstone.rchland.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1502371637.6577.48.camel@brimstone.rchland.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2017-08/txt/msg00746.txt.bz2

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 08:27:17AM -0500, Will Schmidt wrote:
> A testcase coverage issue and an obvious typo fix.
> 
> Mostly obvious,..  OK for trunk? 

Yes; one comment:

> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-pack-longlong.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-pack-longlong.c
> index d8acc3c..73131bb 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-pack-longlong.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-pack-longlong.c
> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
>  /* Verify that overloaded built-ins for vec_pack with long long
>     inputs produce the right results.  */
>  
> -/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-* && lp64 } } } */
>  /* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p8vector_ok } */
>  /* { dg-options "-mvsx -mpower8-vector -O2" } */

You can just say

/* { dg-do compile { target lp64 } } */

(make sure to test before you commit :-) )


Segher