public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,
	       cel@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix endianness issue with vmrgew and vmrgow permute constant recognition
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 01:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170816225738.GZ13471@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f505c094-92a7-773b-a647-5b55673d13c8@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Hi!

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 04:14:21PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> One of Carl Love's proposed built-in function patches exposed a bug in the Power
> code that recognizes specific permute control vector patterns for a permute, and
> changes the permute to a more specific and more efficient instruction.  The
> patterns for p8_vmrgew_v4si and p8_vmrgow are generated regardless of endianness,
> leading to problems on the little-endian port.

Ouch.

> The use in rs6000.c of p8_vmrgew_v4sf_direct, rather than p8_vmrgew_v4si_direct,
> is arbitrary.  The existing code already handles converting (for free) a V4SI
> operand to a V4SF one, so there's no need to specify the mode directly; and it
> would actually complicate the code to extract the mode so the "proper" pattern
> would match.  I think what I have here is better, but if you disagree I can
> change it.

It's fine I think.

This is okay for trunk, thanks!


Segher

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-16 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-15 22:08 Bill Schmidt
2017-08-15 22:09 ` Bill Schmidt
2017-08-17  1:39 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170816225738.GZ13471@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).