From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12403 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2017 09:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12391 invoked by uid 89); 5 Sep 2017 09:53:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:930, HTo:U*gerald, H*Ad:U*gerald, undesirable X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 09:53:24 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD0445F7AC; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:53:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com DD0445F7AC Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=jakub@redhat.com Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-33.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.33]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70E3ACDBEA; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v859rJkc014392; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:53:19 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v859rH6b014391; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:53:17 +0200 Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 09:53:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Gerald Pfeifer , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, richard.sandiford@linaro.org Subject: Re: [00/77] Add wrapper classes for machine_modes Message-ID: <20170905095317.GD2323@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <877exf8rja.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877exf8rja.fsf@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-09/txt/msg00234.txt.bz2 On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 09:18:33PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Gerald Pfeifer writes: > > Hi Richard, > > > > I'm afraid your patchset has broken bootstrap on i686-unknown-freebsd10.3, > > in fact, it appears on FreeBSD in general (amd64-unknown-freebsd11 as well): > > This sounds like the same as PR82045. Could you try the patch I posted > here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg00062.html ? Richard, could you please next time commit such a huge series of patches that has not been tested separately as one commit (or test the patches also individually)? It is sometimes fine for patch review if the granularity is smaller, but e.g. for bisection having long ranges of commits that don't build/bootstrap at all is highly undesirable. That seems to be at least on x86_64-linux the case of r251470 to r251503 inclusive. Thanks Jakub