From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 85365 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2017 19:44:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 85344 invoked by uid 89); 26 Oct 2017 19:44:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 19:44:03 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C0DD4E4C6; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 19:44:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 5C0DD4E4C6 Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=jakub@redhat.com Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-247.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.247]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00D585D965; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 19:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v9QJhwbH024070; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:43:59 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v9QJhulg023744; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:43:56 +0200 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 19:45:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Richard Biener Cc: GCC Patches , Richard Sandiford Subject: Re: [09/nn] Add a fixed_size_mode_pod class Message-ID: <20171026194356.GV14653@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <87wp3mxgir.fsf@linaro.org> <87tvyqw1ki.fsf@linaro.org> <87y3ny14rf.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg01995.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 02:43:55PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Richard Sandiford > wrote: > > Richard Biener writes: > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Richard Sandiford > >> wrote: > >>> This patch adds a POD version of fixed_size_mode. The only current use > >>> is for storing the __builtin_apply and __builtin_result register modes, > >>> which were made fixed_size_modes by the previous patch. > >> > >> Bah - can we update our host compiler to C++11/14 please ...? > >> (maybe requiring that build with GCC 4.8 as host compiler works, > >> GCC 4.3 has -std=c++0x, but I'm quite sure that's not enough). > > > > That'd be great :-) It would avoid all the poly_int_pod stuff too, > > and allow some clean-up of wide-int.h. > > Can you figure what oldest GCC release supports the C++11/14 POD handling > that would be required? I think it is too early for that, we aren't LLVM or Rust that don't really care about what build requirements they impose on users. Jakub