From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,
Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR libgcc/83112, Fix warnings on libgcc float128-ifunc.c
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 23:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171201235355.GL10515@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171201054022.GA5348@ibm-tiger.the-meissners.org>
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 12:40:22AM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> After committing the previous patch, I noticed that it was now generating
> warnings for __{mul,div}kc3_{sw,hw} not having a prototype that I hadn't
> noticed during development of the patch. This is due to the fact that before I
> added the ifunc support, it was only compiling __{mul,div}kc3, and those have
> built-in declarations. I installed this patch as being obvious:
>
> 2017-11-30 Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> * config/rs6000/_mulkc3.c (__mulkc3): Add forward declaration.
> * config/rs6000/_divkc3.c (__divkc3): Likewise.
>
> Index: libgcc/config/rs6000/_divkc3.c
> ===================================================================
> --- libgcc/config/rs6000/_divkc3.c (revision 255288)
> +++ libgcc/config/rs6000/_divkc3.c (working copy)
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ typedef __complex float KCtype __attribu
> #define __divkc3 __divkc3_sw
> #endif
>
> +extern KCtype __divkc3 (KFtype, KFtype, KFtype, KFtype);
> +
> KCtype
> __divkc3 (KFtype a, KFtype b, KFtype c, KFtype d)
> {
How does this warn? -Wmissing-declarations? Should this declaration be
in a header then?
A code comment explaining why you do a declaration for exactly the same
thing as there is two lines later would help; otherwise people will try
to delete it again :-)
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-01 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-27 19:57 Michael Meissner
2017-11-27 22:55 ` Martin Sebor
2017-11-28 0:55 ` Michael Meissner
2017-11-30 5:08 ` Segher Boessenkool
2017-11-30 21:52 ` Michael Meissner
2017-12-01 5:40 ` Michael Meissner
2017-12-01 23:54 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2017-12-11 20:58 ` Michael Meissner
2017-12-12 17:05 ` Segher Boessenkool
2017-12-12 17:18 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-12-12 21:56 ` Michael Meissner
2017-12-13 20:57 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171201235355.GL10515@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=msebor@gmail.com \
--cc=wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).