From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 103434 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2017 13:42:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103425 invoked by uid 89); 8 Dec 2017 13:42:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_SHORT,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 13:42:00 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9164D61E51; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-34.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.34]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31B1A18EE9; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vB8DfuKN020660; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:41:56 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id vB8Dftde020659; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:41:55 +0100 Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 13:42:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Jason Merrill , Nathan Sidwell Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: C++ patch ping Message-ID: <20171208134155.GW2353@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-12/txt/msg00492.txt.bz2 Hi! I'd like to ping two patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg02521.html PR c++/83205 - diagnose invalid std::tuple_size::value for structured bindings; the follow-up with plural spelling is approved already http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg02629.html PR c++/83217 - handle references to non-complete type in structured bindings Jakub