From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 129810 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2017 16:10:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129551 invoked by uid 89); 11 Dec 2017 16:10:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=HTo:U*wschmidt X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:10:44 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id vBBGAflh002376; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:10:41 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id vBBGAevX002370; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:10:40 -0600 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:10:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Michael Meissner , GCC Patches , David Edelsohn , Bill Schmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH #2], PR target/81959, Fix ++int to _Float128 conversion on power9 Message-ID: <20171211161040.GP10515@gate.crashing.org> References: <20171130215244.GA21037@ibm-tiger.the-meissners.org> <20171201233339.GI10515@gate.crashing.org> <20171204213155.GA14761@ibm-tiger.the-meissners.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171204213155.GA14761@ibm-tiger.the-meissners.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-12/txt/msg00626.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 04:31:55PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 05:33:39PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > Okay for trunk. Further improvements welcome ;-) Thanks! > > Here is the patch for GCC 7 (the bug shows up in GCC 7). It is slightly > different due to the surrounding lines in rs6000.c being different. Is it ok > to apply? There were no regressions in the build. It looks fine... Okay for 7. Thanks! Segher > [gcc] > 2017-12-04 Michael Meissner > > Back port from trunk > 2017-12-01 Michael Meissner > > PR target/81959 > * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_address_for_fpconvert): Check for > whether we can allocate pseudos before trying to fix an address. > * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (float_si2_hw): Make sure the > memory address is indexed or indirect. > (floatuns_si2_hw2): Likewise. > > [gcct/testsuite] > 2017-12-04 Michael Meissner > > Back port from trunk > 2017-12-01 Michael Meissner > > PR target/81959 > * gcc.target/powerpc/pr81959.c: New test.