The 12/13/2017 08:49, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 12 December 2017 at 18:29, Tamar Christina <tamar.christina@arm.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The previous test made use of arm_neon.h which made the whole test
> > rather fragile and only applicable to some of the arm targets.
> >
> > So instead I make use of different fpus now to test the generation of
> > fmla instructions. The actual instruction itself is not tested as all
> > we care about if that the proper .fpu directives are generated.
> >
> > Regtested on arm-none-eabi and arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
> > with no regressions.
> >
> > Ok for trunk?
> >
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/
> > 2017-12-12  Tamar Christina  <tamar.christina@arm.com>
> >
> >         PR target/82641
> >         * gcc.target/arm/pragma_fpu_attribute.c: New.
> >         * gcc.target/arm/pragma_fpu_attribute_2.c: New.

Hi Christophe,

My apologies, I have rebased the patch.
New Changelog:

gcc/testsuite/
2017-12-14  Tamar Christina  <tamar.christina@arm.com>

	PR target/82641
	* gcc.target/arm/pragma_fpu_attribute.c: Rewrite to use
	no NEON.
	* gcc.target/arm/pragma_fpu_attribute_2.c: Likewise.

> >
> Sorry, it seems your patch does not apply against ToT, and
> the ChangeLog looks incorrect (these are not new files)
> 
> Christophe

Thanks,
Tamar

--