From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-472808-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 109757 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2018 23:35:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109741 invoked by uid 89); 7 Feb 2018 23:35:12 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: gate.crashing.org
Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 23:35:11 +0000
Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id w17NZ8Qk003523;	Wed, 7 Feb 2018 17:35:08 -0600
Received: (from segher@localhost)	by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id w17NZ743003522;	Wed, 7 Feb 2018 17:35:07 -0600
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 23:35:00 -0000
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,        Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Update vsx-vector-6-le.c tests for p9 target
Message-ID: <20180207233506.GJ21977@gate.crashing.org>
References: <1518023772.11602.268.camel@brimstone.rchland.ibm.com> <20180207182844.GG21977@gate.crashing.org> <1518045811.11602.277.camel@brimstone.rchland.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1518045811.11602.277.camel@brimstone.rchland.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2018-02/txt/msg00376.txt.bz2

On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:23:31PM -0600, Will Schmidt wrote:
> > >  /* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc64le-*-* && lp64 } } } */
> > >  /* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-darwin* } } */
> > >  /* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */
> > > -/* { dg-options "-mvsx -O2" } */
> > > +/* { dg-options "-mvsx -O2 -mcpu=power8" } */
> > 
> > Why not -mcpu=power7?  And you'll need
> 
> My default answer on that one is "power7 + le = nope". :-)
> I can be convinced otherwise if there are strong feelings, etc. 

No really strong feelings no.  But previously we ran this test on power7
(but the powerpc64le-* prevents that in reality) and now we don't anymore.


Segher