AArch64 patch ping

[Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>]

Hi!

I'd like to ping this patch from Steve.

On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 02:14:26PM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> This is a fix for PR target/83335.  We are asserting in
> aarch64_print_address_internal because we have a non Pmode
> address coming from an asm instruction.  My fix is to 
> just allow this by checking this_is_asm_operands.  This is
> what it was doing before the assert was added that caused
> the ICE.
> 
> Verified that it fixed gcc.target/aarch64/asm-2.c in ILP32
> mode and that it caused no regressions.
> 
> Steve Ellcey
> sellcey@cavium.com
> 
> 
> 2018-01-05  Steve Ellcey  <sellcey@cavium.com>
> 
> 	PR target/83335
> 	* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_print_address_internal):
> 	Allow non Pmode address in asm statements.
> 
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> index a189605..af74212 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> @@ -5670,8 +5670,9 @@ aarch64_print_address_internal (FILE *f, machine_mode mode, rtx x,
>  {
>    struct aarch64_address_info addr;
>  
> -  /* Check all addresses are Pmode - including ILP32.  */
> -  gcc_assert (GET_MODE (x) == Pmode);
> +  /* Check all addresses are Pmode - including ILP32,
> +     unless this is coming from an asm statement.  */
> +  gcc_assert (GET_MODE (x) == Pmode || this_is_asm_operands);
>  
>    if (aarch64_classify_address (&addr, x, mode, true, type))
>      switch (addr.type)

	Jakub