From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 46190 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2018 14:35:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 46178 invoked by uid 89); 20 Mar 2018 14:35:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:35:32 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0C72402678E for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.36.118.110]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0B37215CDB7 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:35:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w2KCilaN031069; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 13:44:47 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w2KCikbj031068; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 13:44:46 +0100 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:37:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Richard Biener Cc: "Bin.Cheng" , gcc-patches List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR84859 Message-ID: <20180320124446.GB8577@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20180319115741.GL8577@tucnak> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-03/txt/msg00966.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 01:42:04PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > 2018-03-20 Richard Biener > > * testsuite/libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-4.c: XFAIL one > parallelizable loop. > > Index: libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-4.c > =================================================================== > --- libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-4.c (revision 258678) > +++ libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-4.c (working copy) > @@ -46,7 +46,10 @@ int main(void) > return 0; > } > > -/* Check that parallel code generation part make the right answer. */ > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "2 loops carried no dependency" 1 "graphite" } } */ > +/* Check that parallel code generation part make the right answer. > + ??? XFAILed for i1 because conditional store elimination wrecks > + our dependence representation. */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "2 loops carried no dependency" 1 "graphite" { xfail *-*-* } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "1 loops carried no dependency" 1 "graphite" } } */ Shouldn't this line be then "\[12] loops carried no dependency" 1 "graphite" } } */ so that when the previous starts XPASSing, we don't actually get a new FAIL? > /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loopfn.0" 4 "optimized" } } */ > /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loopfn.1" 4 "optimized" } } */ Jakub