From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12704 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2018 20:35:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12679 invoked by uid 89); 12 Apr 2018 20:35:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:516 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:35:34 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D6664270960 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.36.118.110]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1F2F10B0090 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w3CIwg6p022889; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:58:43 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w3CIwewH020771; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:58:40 +0200 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:35:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Cesar Philippidis Cc: "H.J. Lu" , Richard Biener , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle empty infinite loops in OpenACC for PR84955 Message-ID: <20180412185840.GR8577@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20180406141029.GF8577@tucnak> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00637.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:39:43AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote: > Strange. I didn't observe any regressions when I tested it. But, then > again, I was testing against revision > > r259092 | jason | 2018-04-04 09:42:55 -0700 (Wed, 04 Apr 2018) | 4 lines > > which is over a week old. I'll revert that patch for now, and revisit > this issue in stage1. You should have kept the omp-expand.c chunk, that is correct and shouldn't cause issues. Jakub