public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
	Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtlanal: Fix nonzero_bits for non-load paradoxical subregs (PR85925)
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 22:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180917220052.GN23155@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <305632139.bEVa8srL7U@polaris>

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 10:57:05PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > In the PR we have insns:
> > 
> > Trying 23 -> 24:
> >    23: r123:SI=zero_extend(r122:HI)
> >       REG_DEAD r122:HI
> >    24: [r115:SI]=r123:SI
> >       REG_DEAD r123:SI
> > 
> > which should be combined to
> > 
> > (set (mem:SI (reg/f:SI 115 [ pretmp_19 ]) [1 *pretmp_19+0 S4 A32])
> >     (and:SI (subreg:SI (reg:HI 122) 0)
> >         (const_int 32767 [0x7fff])))
> > 
> > But nonzero_bits of reg:HI 122 is 0x7fff, and nonzero_bits1 thinks it
> > then also has that same nonzero_bits for the subreg.  This is not
> > correct: the bit outside of HImode are undefined.  load_extend_op
> > applies to loads from memory only, not anything else.  Which means the
> > whole AND is optimised away.
> 
> No, this is done on purpose for WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS targets and your 
> patch will pessimize them.  I'm going to have a look at the PR then.

Hi Eric,

Do you have any progress with this?


Segher

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-17 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-04 12:58 Segher Boessenkool
2018-06-04 20:57 ` Eric Botcazou
2018-06-04 22:12   ` Richard Sandiford
2018-06-04 23:31     ` Eric Botcazou
2018-09-17 22:03   ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2018-09-18  8:28     ` Eric Botcazou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180917220052.GN23155@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=ebotcazou@adacore.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).