From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-486145-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11423 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2018 16:49:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11394 invoked by uid 89); 21 Sep 2018 16:49:54 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:719, management, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 16:49:53 +0000
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0863C057FAB;	Fri, 21 Sep 2018 16:49:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.33.36.94])	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E6D8208B;	Fri, 21 Sep 2018 16:49:51 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:13:00 -0000
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Dumont <frs.dumont@gmail.com>
Cc: "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>,	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR libstdc++/87135 Rehash only when necessary (LWG2156)
Message-ID: <20180921164950.GO23172@redhat.com>
References: <1ad7ad86-0f0c-e8b0-8f29-2b5303718988@gmail.com> <20180918084159.GV23172@redhat.com> <712c7e85-fd7b-5849-85b6-14784266d567@gmail.com> <20180919110724.GC23172@redhat.com> <a263be37-f36b-b616-3c38-c885586d1e2f@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <a263be37-f36b-b616-3c38-c885586d1e2f@gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
X-SW-Source: 2018-09/txt/msg01248.txt.bz2

On 21/09/18 18:10 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
>Here is the patch complement.
>
>load_factor.cc failure revealed a bug in load factor management. Now 
>computation of _M_next_resize is consistent throughout the different 
>places where it is set.
>
>The 2 other tests only have to be adapted.
>
>    PR libstdc++/87135
>    * src/c++11/hashtable_c++0x.cc (_Prime_rehash_policy::_M_next_bkt):
>    Use __builtin_floor to compute _M_next_resize.
>    * testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/hash_policy/71181.cc: Adapt.
>    * testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/hash_policy/prime_rehash.cc:
>    Adapt.
>
>Now fully tested under x86_64.
>
>Ok to commit ?

OK, thanks.