From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-487250-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 62375 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2018 11:19:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62362 invoked by uid 89); 10 Oct 2018 11:19:34 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:281, Calls
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:19:33 +0000
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 201A183F3E;	Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:19:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-117-222.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.222])	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BD9A798AF;	Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:19:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9ABJRPZ008000;	Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:19:27 +0200
Received: (from jakub@localhost)	by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9ABJQdx007999;	Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:19:26 +0200
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:53:00 -0000
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>, Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>,        GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH to implement P1064R0, Virtual Function Calls in Constant Expressions (v4)
Message-ID: <20181010111926.GV11625@tucnak>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
References: <CADzB+2ni0YpayYRgoSYt63_ig4f_Hxsag23_yytm03qG91ejfw@mail.gmail.com> <20180918185534.GR16755@redhat.com> <mvmlg7xvcup.fsf@suse.de> <20180919140518.GN5587@redhat.com> <mvmfty5v83t.fsf@suse.de> <20180919151023.GO5587@redhat.com> <CADzB+2kLAL-61sBt+jP7GGoJSBLrYHPE6+SGc+DwBzRCU7jrBw@mail.gmail.com> <mvm36u4vdze.fsf@suse.de> <20180920092059.GE8250@tucnak> <mvmin2c4l2l.fsf@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <mvmin2c4l2l.fsf@suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2018-10/txt/msg00554.txt.bz2

On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 03:36:18PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> This still doesn't fix the tests.

Sure, one needs to add the constexpr virtual calls for ia64 as I said in the
mail.

	Jakub