public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com,	agraf@suse.de,
	marcus.shawcroft@arm.com,	james.greenhalgh@arm.com,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: [PATCH, AArch64, v3 3/6] aarch64: Tidy aarch64_split_compare_and_swap
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 21:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181101214648.29432-4-richard.henderson@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181101214648.29432-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org>

From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>

With aarch64_track_speculation, we had extra code to do exactly what the
!strong_zero_p path already did.  The rest is reducing code duplication.

	* config/aarch64/aarch64 (aarch64_split_compare_and_swap): Disable
	strong_zero_p for aarch64_track_speculation; unify some code paths;
	use aarch64_gen_compare_reg instead of open-coding.
---
 gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c | 50 ++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
index 942f2037235..b29f437aeaf 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
@@ -14767,13 +14767,11 @@ aarch64_emit_post_barrier (enum memmodel model)
 void
 aarch64_split_compare_and_swap (rtx operands[])
 {
-  rtx rval, mem, oldval, newval, scratch;
+  rtx rval, mem, oldval, newval, scratch, x, model_rtx;
   machine_mode mode;
   bool is_weak;
   rtx_code_label *label1, *label2;
-  rtx x, cond;
   enum memmodel model;
-  rtx model_rtx;
 
   rval = operands[0];
   mem = operands[1];
@@ -14794,7 +14792,8 @@ aarch64_split_compare_and_swap (rtx operands[])
 	CBNZ	scratch, .label1
     .label2:
 	CMP	rval, 0.  */
-  bool strong_zero_p = !is_weak && oldval == const0_rtx && mode != TImode;
+  bool strong_zero_p = (!is_weak && !aarch64_track_speculation &&
+			oldval == const0_rtx && mode != TImode);
 
   label1 = NULL;
   if (!is_weak)
@@ -14807,35 +14806,20 @@ aarch64_split_compare_and_swap (rtx operands[])
   /* The initial load can be relaxed for a __sync operation since a final
      barrier will be emitted to stop code hoisting.  */
   if (is_mm_sync (model))
-    aarch64_emit_load_exclusive (mode, rval, mem,
-				 GEN_INT (MEMMODEL_RELAXED));
+    aarch64_emit_load_exclusive (mode, rval, mem, GEN_INT (MEMMODEL_RELAXED));
   else
     aarch64_emit_load_exclusive (mode, rval, mem, model_rtx);
 
   if (strong_zero_p)
-    {
-      if (aarch64_track_speculation)
-	{
-	  /* Emit an explicit compare instruction, so that we can correctly
-	     track the condition codes.  */
-	  rtx cc_reg = aarch64_gen_compare_reg (NE, rval, const0_rtx);
-	  x = gen_rtx_NE (GET_MODE (cc_reg), cc_reg, const0_rtx);
-	}
-      else
-	x = gen_rtx_NE (VOIDmode, rval, const0_rtx);
-
-      x = gen_rtx_IF_THEN_ELSE (VOIDmode, x,
-				gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (Pmode, label2), pc_rtx);
-      aarch64_emit_unlikely_jump (gen_rtx_SET (pc_rtx, x));
-    }
+    x = gen_rtx_NE (VOIDmode, rval, const0_rtx);
   else
     {
-      cond = aarch64_gen_compare_reg_maybe_ze (NE, rval, oldval, mode);
-      x = gen_rtx_NE (VOIDmode, cond, const0_rtx);
-      x = gen_rtx_IF_THEN_ELSE (VOIDmode, x,
-				gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (Pmode, label2), pc_rtx);
-      aarch64_emit_unlikely_jump (gen_rtx_SET (pc_rtx, x));
+      rtx cc_reg = aarch64_gen_compare_reg_maybe_ze (NE, rval, oldval, mode);
+      x = gen_rtx_NE (VOIDmode, cc_reg, const0_rtx);
     }
+  x = gen_rtx_IF_THEN_ELSE (VOIDmode, x,
+			    gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (Pmode, label2), pc_rtx);
+  aarch64_emit_unlikely_jump (gen_rtx_SET (pc_rtx, x));
 
   aarch64_emit_store_exclusive (mode, scratch, mem, newval, model_rtx);
 
@@ -14856,22 +14840,16 @@ aarch64_split_compare_and_swap (rtx operands[])
       aarch64_emit_unlikely_jump (gen_rtx_SET (pc_rtx, x));
     }
   else
-    {
-      cond = gen_rtx_REG (CCmode, CC_REGNUM);
-      x = gen_rtx_COMPARE (CCmode, scratch, const0_rtx);
-      emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (cond, x));
-    }
+    aarch64_gen_compare_reg (NE, scratch, const0_rtx);
 
   emit_label (label2);
+
   /* If we used a CBNZ in the exchange loop emit an explicit compare with RVAL
      to set the condition flags.  If this is not used it will be removed by
      later passes.  */
   if (strong_zero_p)
-    {
-      cond = gen_rtx_REG (CCmode, CC_REGNUM);
-      x = gen_rtx_COMPARE (CCmode, rval, const0_rtx);
-      emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (cond, x));
-    }
+    aarch64_gen_compare_reg (NE, rval, const0_rtx);
+
   /* Emit any final barrier needed for a __sync operation.  */
   if (is_mm_sync (model))
     aarch64_emit_post_barrier (model);
-- 
2.17.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-01 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-01 21:47 [PATCH, AArch64, v3 0/6] LSE atomics out-of-line Richard Henderson
2018-11-01 21:46 ` [PATCH, AArch64, v3 1/6] aarch64: Extend %R for integer registers Richard Henderson
2018-11-01 21:46 ` [PATCH, AArch64, v3 2/6] aarch64: Implement TImode compare-and-swap Richard Henderson
2018-11-01 21:47 ` [PATCH, AArch64, v3 4/6] aarch64: Add out-of-line functions for LSE atomics Richard Henderson
2019-09-05 10:00   ` Kyrill Tkachov
2019-09-05 12:13     ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-05 12:53       ` Kyrill Tkachov
2018-11-01 21:47 ` [PATCH, AArch64, v3 5/6] aarch64: Implement -matomic-ool Richard Henderson
2019-09-05  9:56   ` Kyrill Tkachov
2019-09-05 12:17     ` Richard Henderson
2018-11-01 21:47 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2018-11-01 21:47 ` [PATCH, AArch64, v3 6/6] Enable -matomic-ool by default Richard Henderson
2018-11-11 12:30 ` [PATCH, AArch64, v3 0/6] LSE atomics out-of-line Richard Henderson
2019-09-05  9:51 ` Kyrill Tkachov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181101214648.29432-4-richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=james.greenhalgh@arm.com \
    --cc=marcus.shawcroft@arm.com \
    --cc=ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).