From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-489456-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17444 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2018 20:34:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17435 invoked by uid 89); 8 Nov 2018 20:34:47 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: gate.crashing.org
Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 20:34:46 +0000
Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id wA8KYMUW030684;	Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:34:22 -0600
Received: (from segher@localhost)	by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id wA8KYJad030682;	Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:34:19 -0600
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 20:34:00 -0000
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Sam Tebbs <Sam.Tebbs@arm.com>
Cc: Steve Ellcey <sellcey@cavium.com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>,        "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,        "bergner@linux.ibm.com" <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] combine: Do not combine moves from hard registers
Message-ID: <20181108203418.GT5994@gate.crashing.org>
References: <mvmbm7jr5nm.fsf@suse.de> <1540571945.12895.67.camel@cavium.com> <20181026164805.GN5205@gate.crashing.org> <7bc8697f-a09e-627f-b032-eba5ecb682ac@arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7bc8697f-a09e-627f-b032-eba5ecb682ac@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2018-11/txt/msg00658.txt.bz2

On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:44:44PM +0000, Sam Tebbs wrote:
> Does your patch fix the incorrect generation of "scvtf s1, s1"? I was
> looking at the issue as well and don't want to do any overlapping work.

I don't know.  Well, there are no incorrect code issues I know of at all
now; but you mean that it is taking an instruction more than you would
like to see, I suppose?


Segher