public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>,
	       Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] diagnose unsupported uses of hardware register variables (PR 88000)
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 17:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181114174723.GD23873@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.20.13.1811141658570.10221@monopod.intra.ispras.ru>

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 06:50:38PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > I think with "=g" rather than "+g" this example is ok.
> > 
> > No, it needs the register var as an input.  That is the whole *point*.
> 
> Hm. I think I see what you meant, but "+g" is not correct either: the
> asm, by intent, depends *on the current value in the 'sp' hardreg*, not
> *on the current value of some automatic variable that is supposed to be
> passed on the 'sp' hardreg to the asm* (which is what expressed by the
> input constraint).

Yeah, using local register vars to access global registers only works
by accident.  It does work currently though, and people apparently use
it, so we shouldn't break it :-/


Segher

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-14 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-14 12:22 Segher Boessenkool
2018-11-14 12:27 ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-11-14 12:33   ` Alexander Monakov
2018-11-14 13:53     ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-11-14 15:50       ` Alexander Monakov
2018-11-14 17:47         ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2018-11-14 18:01           ` Alexander Monakov
2018-11-15 15:54             ` Michael Matz
2018-11-15 16:23               ` Alexander Monakov
2018-11-16 15:21                 ` Michael Matz
2018-11-16 16:28                   ` Alexander Monakov
2018-11-16 16:43                     ` Michael Matz
2018-11-16 22:12               ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-11-19 12:59                 ` Michael Matz
2018-11-19 17:18                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-11-14 13:47   ` Segher Boessenkool
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-11-14  4:11 Martin Sebor
2018-11-14  9:39 ` Alexander Monakov
2018-11-15 22:34   ` Martin Sebor
2018-11-14  9:48 ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-11-14 11:35   ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-11-14 11:40     ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-11-14 11:50       ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-11-14 12:00         ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-11-14 12:11           ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-11-14 12:14             ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-11-15 18:31   ` Martin Sebor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181114174723.GD23873@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=msebor@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).