From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-491020-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1196 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2018 19:03:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1177 invoked by uid 89); 27 Nov 2018 19:03:17 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: gate.crashing.org
Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 19:03:16 +0000
Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id wARJ377f023634;	Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:03:07 -0600
Received: (from segher@localhost)	by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id wARIeWgs021719;	Tue, 27 Nov 2018 12:40:32 -0600
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 19:03:00 -0000
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Torbjorn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@st.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,        "Joey.Ye@arm.com" <Joey.Ye@arm.com>,        Niklas DAHLQUIST <niklas.dahlquist@st.com>,        Samuel HULTGREN <samuel.hultgren@st.com>,        Christophe LYON <christophe.lyon@st.com>,        Christophe MONAT <christophe.monat@st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added information about inline assembler in stack calculations (.su files)
Message-ID: <20181127184030.GZ23873@gate.crashing.org>
References: <7f229423-5edb-88e8-a5c2-7c9660339255@st.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7f229423-5edb-88e8-a5c2-7c9660339255@st.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2018-11/txt/msg02222.txt.bz2

Hi!

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 02:02:49PM +0000, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
> Attached is a small patch that, in case of inline assembler code, 
> indicates that the function stack usage is uncertain due to inline 
> assembler.
> 
> The test suite are using "nop" as an assembler instruction on all 
> targets, is this acceptable or is there a better way to test this?

Maybe see testsuite/gcc.dg/nop.h ?


Segher