From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 126016 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2018 12:27:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125775 invoked by uid 89); 29 Nov 2018 12:27:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-11.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1385, semantics.c, semanticsc, UD:semantics.c X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:27:10 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id wATCR5K7010718; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 06:27:06 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id wATCR4NB010717; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 06:27:04 -0600 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:27:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: jakub@redhat.com Subject: [ping x3] Re: [PATCH 0/2] asm qualifiers (PR55681) and asm inline Message-ID: <20181129122703.GY23873@gate.crashing.org> References: <20181111003337.GD23873@gate.crashing.org> <20181117145258.GR23873@gate.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181117145258.GR23873@gate.crashing.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-11/txt/msg02433.txt.bz2 Ping x3. On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 08:52:58AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Ping x2. > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 06:33:37PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > Ping. > > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 05:30:32PM +0000, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > This is the same "asm input" patch as before, but now preceded by a patch > > > that makes all orderings of volatile/goto/inline valid, also the other type > > > qualifiers for C, and also repetitions for C. > > > > > > Tested on powerpc64-linux {-m32,-m64}. Is this okay for trunk? > > > > > > > > > Segher > > > > > > > > > gcc/c/c-parser.c | 79 ++++++++++++--------- > > > gcc/c/c-tree.h | 3 +- > > > gcc/c/c-typeck.c | 3 +- > > > gcc/cp/cp-tree.h | 2 +- > > > gcc/cp/parser.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++-------- > > > gcc/cp/pt.c | 2 +- > > > gcc/cp/semantics.c | 3 +- > > > gcc/doc/extend.texi | 10 ++- > > > gcc/gimple-pretty-print.c | 2 + > > > gcc/gimple.h | 24 ++++++- > > > gcc/gimplify.c | 1 + > > > gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c | 3 + > > > gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/torture/asm-inline.c | 53 ++++++++++++++ > > > gcc/tree-core.h | 3 + > > > gcc/tree-inline.c | 3 + > > > gcc/tree.h | 3 + > > > 16 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/torture/asm-inline.c > > > > > > -- > > > 1.8.3.1