From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 117313 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2018 19:20:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 117297 invoked by uid 89); 4 Dec 2018 19:20:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=time!, time X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 19:20:45 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=SVR-IES-MBX-04.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:256) id 1gUGFP-0005Wo-Gu from Julian_Brown@mentor.com ; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 11:20:43 -0800 Received: from squid.athome (137.202.0.90) by SVR-IES-MBX-04.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 19:20:40 +0000 Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 19:20:00 -0000 From: Julian Brown To: Jakub Jelinek CC: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Cesar Philippidis Subject: Re: [PATCH, OpenACC] Support Fortran derived type members in "acc update" directives Message-ID: <20181204192038.624ee67b@squid.athome> In-Reply-To: <20181204191258.GC12380@tucnak> References: <20180903204654.5056f591@squid.athome> <20181204141708.GX12380@tucnak> <20181204190643.1d71e768@squid.athome> <20181204191258.GC12380@tucnak> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-12/txt/msg00227.txt.bz2 On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:12:58 +0100 Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 07:06:43PM +0000, Julian Brown wrote: > > Thanks for the review! As it happened though, I had to rewrite a > > lot of the code in this patch for the attach/detach patch, and I > > had meant to withdraw this one. Many apologies about the wasted > > time! I mentioned the superseding in the first submission of the > > attach/detach patch: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg00826.html > > I haven't looked at the dynamic array series because I haven't heard > back on https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg00946.html Those patches are independent of the attach/detach ones (though the latter do depend on Chung-Lin's async support patches). Thanks, Julian