public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@charter.net>
Cc: Fritz Reese <fritzoreese@gmail.com>,
	mark.eggleston@codethink.co.uk,
	       fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	       Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, Fortran] pad char to int conversions with spaces instead of zeros (legacy)
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 10:50:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181206103312.GP12380@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3666ba47-343a-21ea-cdba-43d9d5a6709f@charter.net>

On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 06:27:00PM -0800, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> I disagree completely. I assume the idea of -fdec-pad-with-spaces is to
> accomodate some old dec fortran code. The only reason to use some other
> character is if someone is writing new dec fortran code, which is implying
> encouraging people to be writing non standard conforming code.
> 
> Even if it is conforming in the sense that it is processor dependent you are
> encouraging people to create new non portable code across compilers. Please
> just stay consistent with Intel.

So do you prefer to always use ' ' instead of '\0', or decide based on -fdec
without a separate option controlling that?

	Jakub

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-06 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-04 14:47 Mark Eggleston
2018-12-04 15:11 ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-12-04 17:04   ` Fritz Reese
2018-12-06  2:27     ` Jerry DeLisle
2018-12-06 10:50       ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2018-12-06 10:54         ` Mark Eggleston
2018-12-07  1:57         ` Jerry DeLisle
2018-12-06 10:34     ` Mark Eggleston
2018-12-10 14:09       ` Mark Eggleston
2018-12-10 17:12         ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-12-10 19:44           ` Fritz Reese
2018-12-12 11:37           ` Mark Eggleston
2018-12-12 11:53             ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-12-12 12:06               ` Mark Eggleston
2018-12-12 12:12                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2018-12-12 15:12                 ` Mark Eggleston
2018-12-06 10:23   ` Mark Eggleston

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181206103312.GP12380@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=fritzoreese@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jvdelisle@charter.net \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark.eggleston@codethink.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).