From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-491812-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21697 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2018 18:11:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21561 invoked by uid 89); 6 Dec 2018 18:11:09 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:589
X-HELO: gate.crashing.org
Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 18:11:06 +0000
Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id wB6IAx8B024550;	Thu, 6 Dec 2018 12:10:59 -0600
Received: (from segher@localhost)	by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id wB6IAvsT024548;	Thu, 6 Dec 2018 12:10:57 -0600
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 18:11:00 -0000
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: jakub@redhat.com, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>, jason@redhat.com,        nathan@acm.org, polacek@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] asm qualifiers (PR55681) and asm inline
Message-ID: <20181206181055.GB3803@gate.crashing.org>
References: <cover.1543766396.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cover.1543766396.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2018-12/txt/msg00386.txt.bz2

Hi all,

On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 04:38:16PM +0000, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> v2, with the input from Joseph taken into account.
> 
> This is the same "asm inline" patch as before, but now preceded by a
> patch that makes all orderings of volatile/goto/inline valid, all other
> type qualifiers invalid, all repetitions of qualifiers invalid.

Committed now, with everyone's suggestions addressed.

Is this okay for backport to 8?  Maybe 7?  After a week or so, of course.
This will help the Linux people to use it sooner.


Segher