Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] asm qualifiers (PR55681) and asm inline

[Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>]

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 07:15:20PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 12:10:56PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 04:38:16PM +0000, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > v2, with the input from Joseph taken into account.
> > > 
> > > This is the same "asm inline" patch as before, but now preceded by a
> > > patch that makes all orderings of volatile/goto/inline valid, all other
> > > type qualifiers invalid, all repetitions of qualifiers invalid.
> > 
> > Committed now, with everyone's suggestions addressed.
> > 
> > Is this okay for backport to 8?  Maybe 7?  After a week or so, of course.
> > This will help the Linux people to use it sooner.
> 
> Not sure if in the backport we shouldn't keep accepting with warning like
> before const asm and not do the changes of accepting in any order except
> perhaps for the inline keyword in there?

Okay, I'll edit the const (etc.) back in.  The "any order" is easier to
keep this way I think (and doesn't change anything for code that was
already accepted).


Segher