From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 103714 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2019 11:30:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103414 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jan 2019 11:30:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=accepting, Hx-languages-length:807 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:30:20 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53693AC5F2; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-18.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.18]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D07DE5D9C6; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x0BBUAiI022902; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 12:30:10 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x0BBU7do022526; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 12:30:07 +0100 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:30:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Steve Ellcey , "sellcey@cavium.com" , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , rguenther@suse.de, richard.sandiford@arm.com Subject: Re: [Patch 4/4][Aarch64] v2: Implement Aarch64 SIMD ABI Message-ID: <20190111113007.GK30353@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <1541699749.12016.9.camel@cavium.com> <87tvjq3kqs.fsf@arm.com> <875zv0l64x.fsf@arm.com> <7bdc455d8d0b38778e151ad8ce8cfe6b69c580c5.camel@marvell.com> <87d0p6gng4.fsf@arm.com> <175d9f25425f2aa634e2bd88f7ee6eefabae97ed.camel@marvell.com> <87bm4o98jr.fsf@arm.com> <1faa09dc8a758006fc373f6e4296ea1d5c39043d.camel@marvell.com> <87ef9j30bw.fsf@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ef9j30bw.fsf@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg00615.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 11:22:59AM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Steve Ellcey writes: > > If this looks good to you can I go ahead and check it in? I know > > we are in Stage 3 now, but my recollection is that patches that were > > initially submitted during Stage 1 could go ahead once approved. > > Yeah, like you say, this was originally posted in stage 1 and is the > last patch in the series. Not committing it would leave the work > incomplete in GCC 9. The problem is that we're now in stage 4 rather > than stage 3. > > I don't think I'm neutral enough to make the call. Richard, Jakub? I'm ok with accepting this late as an exception, if it can be committed reasonably soon (within a week or at most two). Jakub