public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH to implement deferred parsing of noexcept-specifiers (c++/86476, c++/52869)
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 19:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190510192133.GC20687@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90c62261-b25e-0611-696d-044d319571cc@redhat.com>

Coming back to this.  I didn't think this was suitable for GCC 9.

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:44:37AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/19/18 3:27 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > Prompted by Jon's observation in 52869, I noticed that we don't treat
> > a noexcept-specifier as a complete-class context of a class ([class.mem]/6).
> > As with member function bodies, default arguments, and NSDMIs, names used in
> > a noexcept-specifier of a member-function can be declared later in the class
> > body, so we need to wait and parse them at the end of the class.
> > For that, I've made use of DEFAULT_ARG (now best to be renamed to UNPARSED_ARG).
> 
> Or DEFERRED_PARSE, yes.

I didn't change the name but I'm happy to do it as a follow up.

> > +  /* We can't compare unparsed noexcept-specifiers.  Save the old decl
> > +     and check this again after we've parsed the noexcept-specifiers
> > +     for real.  */
> > +  if (UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (new_exceptions))
> > +    {
> > +      vec_safe_push (DEFARG_INSTANTIATIONS (TREE_PURPOSE (new_exceptions)),
> > +		     copy_decl (old_decl));
> > +      return;
> > +    }
> 
> Why copy_decl?

This is so that we don't lose the diagnostic in noexcept46.C.  If I don't use
copy_decl then the tree is shared and subsequent changes to it make us not
detect discrepancies like noexcept(false) vs. noexcept(true) on the same decl.

> It seems wasteful to allocate a vec to hold this single decl; let's make the
> last field of tree_default_arg a union instead.  And add a new macro for the
> single decl case.

Done.  But that required also adding GTY markers *and* a new BOOL_BITFIELD for
the sake of GTY((desc)).

> I notice that default_arg currently uses tree_common for some reason, and we
> ought to be able to save two words by switching to tree_base

Done.

> > @@ -1245,6 +1245,7 @@ nothrow_spec_p (const_tree spec)
> >   	      || TREE_VALUE (spec)
> >   	      || spec == noexcept_false_spec
> >   	      || TREE_PURPOSE (spec) == error_mark_node
> > +	      || TREE_CODE (TREE_PURPOSE (spec)) == DEFAULT_ARG
> 
> Maybe use UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P here?
 
Done.

> > +/* Make sure that any member-function parameters are in scope.
> > +   For instance, a function's noexcept-specifier can use the function's
> > +   parameters:
> > +
> > +   struct S {
> > +     void fn (int p) noexcept(noexcept(p));
> > +   };
> > +
> > +   so we need to make sure name lookup can find them.  This is used
> > +   when we delay parsing of the noexcept-specifier.  */
> > +
> > +static void
> > +maybe_begin_member_function_processing (tree decl)
> 
> This name is pretty misleading.  How about inject_parm_decls, to go with
> inject_this_parameter?

Done.

> > +/* Undo the effects of maybe_begin_member_function_processing.  */
> > +
> > +static void
> > +maybe_end_member_function_processing (void)
> 
> And then perhaps pop_injected_parms.

Done.

> > +/* Check throw specifier of OVERRIDER is at least as strict as
> > +   the one of BASEFN.  */
> > +
> > +bool
> > +maybe_check_throw_specifier (tree overrider, tree basefn)
> > +{
> > +  maybe_instantiate_noexcept (basefn);
> > +  maybe_instantiate_noexcept (overrider);
> > +  tree base_throw = TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (TREE_TYPE (basefn));
> > +  tree over_throw = TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (TREE_TYPE (overrider));
> > +
> > +  if (DECL_INVALID_OVERRIDER_P (overrider))
> > +    return true;
> > +
> > +  /* Can't check this yet.  Pretend this is fine and let
> > +     noexcept_override_late_checks check this later.  */
> > +  if (UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (base_throw)
> > +      || UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (over_throw))
> > +    return true;
> > +
> > +  if (!comp_except_specs (base_throw, over_throw, ce_derived))
> > +    {
> > +      auto_diagnostic_group d;
> > +      error ("looser throw specifier for %q+#F", overrider);
> 
> Since we're touching this diagnostic, let's correct it now to "exception
> specification".  And add "on overriding virtual function".

Ok, changed to the more up-to-date term.

Two further changes were required since my changes to detecting 'this' for
static member functions:
1) use THIS_FORBIDDEN if needed when parsing the delayed noexcept,
2) careful about friend member functions -- its DECL_CONTEXT is not the
  containing class, need to use DECL_FRIEND_CONTEXT.

Both of these points are tested in g++.dg/cpp0x/this1.C.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?

2019-05-10  Marek Polacek  <polacek@redhat.com>

	PR c++/86476 - noexcept-specifier is a complete-class context.
	PR c++/52869
	* cp-tree.def (DEFAULT_ARG): Update commentary.
	* cp-tree.h (DEFARG_DECL, DEFARG_NOEXCEPT_P, UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P):
	New macros.
	(tree_default_arg): Add a tree field, make the last two fields into a
	union.  Add GTY markers.
	(check_redeclaration_exception_specification): Declare.
	(maybe_check_throw_specifier): Declare.
	* decl.c (check_redeclaration_exception_specification): No longer
	static.  Handle UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P.
	* except.c (nothrow_spec_p): Accept DEFAULT_ARG in the assert.
	* parser.c (cp_parser_noexcept_specification_opt,
	cp_parser_late_noexcept_specifier, noexcept_override_late_checks):
	Forward-declare.
	(unparsed_noexcepts): New macro.
	(push_unparsed_function_queues): Update initializer.
	(cp_parser_init_declarator): Maybe save the noexcept-specifier to
	post process.
	(inject_parm_decls): New.
	(pop_injected_parms): New.
	(cp_parser_class_specifier_1): Implement delayed parsing of
	noexcept-specifiers.
	(cp_parser_member_declaration): Maybe save the noexcept-specifier to
	post process.
	(cp_parser_save_noexcept): New.
	(cp_parser_late_noexcept_specifier): New.
	(noexcept_override_late_checks): New.
	(cp_parser_noexcept_specification_opt): Call cp_parser_save_noexcept
	instead of the normal processing if needed.
	(cp_parser_save_member_function_body): Maybe save the
	noexcept-specifier to post process.
	* parser.h (cp_unparsed_functions_entry): Add new field to carry
	a noexcept-specifier.
	* pt.c (dependent_type_p_r): Handle unparsed noexcept expression.
	* search.c (maybe_check_throw_specifier): New function, broken out
	of...
	(check_final_overrider): ...here.  Call maybe_check_throw_specifier.
	* tree.c (canonical_eh_spec): Handle UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P.
	(cp_tree_equal): Handle DEFAULT_ARG.
	* typeck2.c (merge_exception_specifiers): If an unparsed noexcept
	expression has been passed, return it instead of merging it.

	* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept41.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept42.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept43.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept44.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept45.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept46.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/eh/shadow1.C: Adjust dg-error.

diff --git gcc/cp/cp-tree.def gcc/cp/cp-tree.def
index 03c105b5c4c..33eb5d25efe 100644
--- gcc/cp/cp-tree.def
+++ gcc/cp/cp-tree.def
@@ -209,7 +209,9 @@ DEFTREECODE (USING_STMT, "using_stmt", tcc_statement, 1)
 
 /* An un-parsed default argument.  Holds a vector of input tokens and
    a vector of places where the argument was instantiated before
-   parsing had occurred.  */
+   parsing had occurred.  This is also used for delayed NSDMIs and
+   noexcept-specifier parsing.  For a noexcept-specifier, we use a tree
+   holding a function declaration used for late checking.  */
 DEFTREECODE (DEFAULT_ARG, "default_arg", tcc_exceptional, 0)
 
 /* An uninstantiated/unevaluated noexcept-specification.  For the
diff --git gcc/cp/cp-tree.h gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
index f253857b02a..ef14a011293 100644
--- gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
+++ gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
@@ -1178,12 +1178,20 @@ enum cp_identifier_kind {
 #define DEFARG_TOKENS(NODE) \
   (((struct tree_default_arg *)DEFAULT_ARG_CHECK (NODE))->tokens)
 #define DEFARG_INSTANTIATIONS(NODE) \
-  (((struct tree_default_arg *)DEFAULT_ARG_CHECK (NODE))->instantiations)
+  (((struct tree_default_arg *)DEFAULT_ARG_CHECK (NODE))->u.instantiations)
+#define DEFARG_DECL(NODE) \
+  (((struct tree_default_arg *)DEFAULT_ARG_CHECK (NODE))->u.decl)
+#define DEFARG_NOEXCEPT_P(NODE) \
+  (((struct tree_default_arg *)DEFAULT_ARG_CHECK (NODE))->noexcept_p)
 
 struct GTY (()) tree_default_arg {
-  struct tree_common common;
+  struct tree_base base;
   struct cp_token_cache *tokens;
-  vec<tree, va_gc> *instantiations;
+  BOOL_BITFIELD noexcept_p : 1;
+  union {
+    vec<tree, va_gc>* GTY((tag ("0"))) instantiations;
+    tree GTY((tag ("1"))) decl;
+  } GTY((desc ("%1.noexcept_p"))) u;
 };
 
 
@@ -1197,6 +1205,9 @@ struct GTY (()) tree_default_arg {
 #define UNEVALUATED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P(NODE)				\
   (DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (NODE)					\
    && DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT_PATTERN (TREE_PURPOSE (NODE)) == NULL_TREE)
+#define UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P(NODE) \
+  ((NODE) && (TREE_PURPOSE (NODE)) \
+   && (TREE_CODE (TREE_PURPOSE (NODE)) == DEFAULT_ARG))
 
 struct GTY (()) tree_deferred_noexcept {
   struct tree_base base;
@@ -6464,6 +6475,8 @@ extern bool check_array_designated_initializer  (constructor_elt *,
 						 unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT);
 extern bool check_for_uninitialized_const_var   (tree, bool, tsubst_flags_t);
 extern tree build_explicit_specifier		(tree, tsubst_flags_t);
+extern void check_redeclaration_exception_specification
+  (tree, tree);
 
 /* in decl2.c */
 extern void record_mangling			(tree, bool);
@@ -6929,6 +6942,7 @@ extern tree copied_binfo			(tree, tree);
 extern tree original_binfo			(tree, tree);
 extern int shared_member_p			(tree);
 extern bool any_dependent_bases_p (tree = current_nonlambda_class_type ());
+extern bool maybe_check_throw_specifier		(tree, tree);
 
 /* The representation of a deferred access check.  */
 
diff --git gcc/cp/decl.c gcc/cp/decl.c
index 36014dc628e..a2effa13623 100644
--- gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ warn_extern_redeclared_static (tree newdecl, tree olddecl)
    function templates.  If their exception specifications do not
    match, issue a diagnostic.  */
 
-static void
+void
 check_redeclaration_exception_specification (tree new_decl,
 					     tree old_decl)
 {
@@ -1151,6 +1151,15 @@ check_redeclaration_exception_specification (tree new_decl,
       && UNEVALUATED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (old_exceptions))
     return;
 
+  /* We can't compare unparsed noexcept-specifiers.  Save the old decl
+     and check this again after we've parsed the noexcept-specifiers
+     for real.  */
+  if (UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (new_exceptions))
+    {
+      DEFARG_DECL (TREE_PURPOSE (new_exceptions)) = copy_decl (old_decl);
+      return;
+    }
+
   if (!type_dependent_expression_p (old_decl))
     {
       maybe_instantiate_noexcept (new_decl);
diff --git gcc/cp/except.c gcc/cp/except.c
index afc261073d7..208c9c1461d 100644
--- gcc/cp/except.c
+++ gcc/cp/except.c
@@ -1248,6 +1248,7 @@ nothrow_spec_p (const_tree spec)
 	      || TREE_VALUE (spec)
 	      || spec == noexcept_false_spec
 	      || TREE_PURPOSE (spec) == error_mark_node
+	      || UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (spec)
 	      || processing_template_decl);
 
   return false;
diff --git gcc/cp/parser.c gcc/cp/parser.c
index 12beadf5096..41197ab3486 100644
--- gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -247,6 +247,12 @@ static void cp_lexer_stop_debugging
 
 static cp_token_cache *cp_token_cache_new
   (cp_token *, cp_token *);
+static tree cp_parser_noexcept_specification_opt
+  (cp_parser *, bool, bool *, bool);
+static tree cp_parser_late_noexcept_specifier
+  (cp_parser *, tree);
+static void noexcept_override_late_checks
+  (tree, tree);
 
 static void cp_parser_initial_pragma
   (cp_token *);
@@ -1974,11 +1980,14 @@ cp_parser_context_new (cp_parser_context* next)
   parser->unparsed_queues->last ().nsdmis
 #define unparsed_classes \
   parser->unparsed_queues->last ().classes
+#define unparsed_noexcepts \
+  parser->unparsed_queues->last ().noexcepts
 
 static void
 push_unparsed_function_queues (cp_parser *parser)
 {
-  cp_unparsed_functions_entry e = {NULL, make_tree_vector (), NULL, NULL};
+  cp_unparsed_functions_entry e = { NULL, make_tree_vector (), NULL, NULL,
+				    NULL };
   vec_safe_push (parser->unparsed_queues, e);
 }
 
@@ -20515,7 +20524,13 @@ cp_parser_init_declarator (cp_parser* parser,
 			/*asmspec=*/NULL_TREE,
 			attr_chainon (attributes, prefix_attributes));
       if (decl && TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL)
-	cp_parser_save_default_args (parser, decl);
+	{
+	  cp_parser_save_default_args (parser, decl);
+	  /* Remember if there is a noexcept-specifier to post process.  */
+	  tree spec = TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (TREE_TYPE (decl));
+	  if (UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (spec))
+	    vec_safe_push (unparsed_noexcepts, decl);
+	}
       cp_finalize_omp_declare_simd (parser, decl);
       cp_finalize_oacc_routine (parser, decl, false);
     }
@@ -23334,6 +23349,45 @@ cp_parser_class_name (cp_parser *parser,
   return decl;
 }
 
+/* Make sure that any member-function parameters are in scope.
+   For instance, a function's noexcept-specifier can use the function's
+   parameters:
+
+   struct S {
+     void fn (int p) noexcept(noexcept(p));
+   };
+
+   so we need to make sure name lookup can find them.  This is used
+   when we delay parsing of the noexcept-specifier.  */
+
+static void
+inject_parm_decls (tree decl)
+{
+  begin_scope (sk_function_parms, decl);
+  tree args = DECL_ARGUMENTS (decl);
+  args = nreverse (args);
+
+  tree next;
+  for (tree parm = args; parm; parm = next)
+    {
+      next = DECL_CHAIN (parm);
+      if (TREE_CODE (parm) == PARM_DECL)
+	pushdecl (parm);
+    }
+  /* Get the decls in their original chain order and record in the
+     function.  This is all and only the PARM_DECLs that were
+     pushed into scope by the loop above.  */
+  DECL_ARGUMENTS (decl) = get_local_decls ();
+}
+
+/* Undo the effects of inject_parm_decls.  */
+
+static void
+pop_injected_parms (void)
+{
+  pop_bindings_and_leave_scope ();
+}
+
 /* Parse a class-specifier.
 
    class-specifier:
@@ -23644,6 +23698,66 @@ cp_parser_class_specifier_1 (cp_parser* parser)
       vec_safe_truncate (unparsed_classes, 0);
       after_nsdmi_defaulted_late_checks (type);
 
+      /* If there are noexcept-specifiers that have not yet been processed,
+	 take care of them now.  */
+      class_type = NULL_TREE;
+      pushed_scope = NULL_TREE;
+      FOR_EACH_VEC_SAFE_ELT (unparsed_noexcepts, ix, decl)
+	{
+	  tree ctx = (DECL_FRIEND_P (decl) ? DECL_FRIEND_CONTEXT (decl)
+		      : DECL_CONTEXT (decl));
+	  if (class_type != ctx)
+	    {
+	      if (pushed_scope)
+		pop_scope (pushed_scope);
+	      class_type = ctx;
+	      pushed_scope = push_scope (class_type);
+	    }
+
+	  /* Make sure that any template parameters are in scope.  */
+	  maybe_begin_member_template_processing (decl);
+
+	  /* Make sure that any member-function parameters are in scope.  */
+	  inject_parm_decls (decl);
+
+	  tree spec = TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (TREE_TYPE (decl));
+	  spec = TREE_PURPOSE (spec);
+	  tree old_decl = DEFARG_DECL (spec);
+
+	  /* 'this' is not allowed in static member functions.  */
+	  unsigned char local_variables_forbidden_p
+	    = parser->local_variables_forbidden_p;
+	  if (DECL_THIS_STATIC (decl))
+	    parser->local_variables_forbidden_p |= THIS_FORBIDDEN;
+
+	  /* Now we can parse the noexcept-specifier.  */
+	  spec = cp_parser_late_noexcept_specifier (parser, spec);
+
+	  /* Restore the state of local_variables_forbidden_p.  */
+	  parser->local_variables_forbidden_p = local_variables_forbidden_p;
+	  if (spec != error_mark_node)
+	    TREE_TYPE (decl) = build_exception_variant (TREE_TYPE (decl), spec);
+
+	  /* If we've stashed an old declaration, it means we need to
+	     perform late redeclaration checking.  */
+	  if (old_decl)
+	    check_redeclaration_exception_specification (decl, old_decl);
+
+	  /* The finish_struct call above performed various override checking,
+	     but it skipped unparsed noexcept-specifier operands.  Now that we
+	     have resolved them, check again.  */
+	  noexcept_override_late_checks (type, decl);
+
+	  /* Remove any member-function parameters from the symbol table.  */
+	  pop_injected_parms ();
+
+	  /* Remove any template parameters from the symbol table.  */
+	  maybe_end_member_template_processing ();
+	}
+      vec_safe_truncate (unparsed_noexcepts, 0);
+      if (pushed_scope)
+	pop_scope (pushed_scope);
+
       /* Now parse the body of the functions.  */
       if (flag_openmp)
 	{
@@ -24817,6 +24931,12 @@ cp_parser_member_declaration (cp_parser* parser)
 		  else
 		    decl = finish_fully_implicit_template (parser, decl);
 		}
+	      if (decl && TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL)
+		{
+		  tree spec = TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (TREE_TYPE (decl));
+		  if (UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (spec))
+		    vec_safe_push (unparsed_noexcepts, decl);
+		}
 	    }
 
 	  cp_finalize_omp_declare_simd (parser, decl);
@@ -25199,6 +25319,90 @@ cp_parser_base_specifier (cp_parser* parser)
 
 /* Exception handling [gram.exception] */
 
+/* Save the tokens that make up the noexcept-specifier for a member-function.
+   Returns a DEFAULT_ARG.  */
+
+static tree
+cp_parser_save_noexcept (cp_parser *parser)
+{
+  cp_token *first = parser->lexer->next_token;
+  /* We want everything up to, including, the final ')'.  */
+  cp_parser_cache_group (parser, CPP_CLOSE_PAREN, /*depth=*/0);
+  cp_token *last = parser->lexer->next_token;
+
+  /* As with default arguments and NSDMIs, make use of DEFAULT_ARG
+     to carry the information we will need.  */
+  tree expr = make_node (DEFAULT_ARG);
+  /* Save away the noexcept-specifier; we will process it when the
+     class is complete.  */
+  DEFARG_TOKENS (expr) = cp_token_cache_new (first, last);
+  DEFARG_DECL (expr) = NULL_TREE;
+  DEFARG_NOEXCEPT_P (expr) = true;
+  expr = build_tree_list (expr, NULL_TREE);
+  return expr;
+}
+
+/* Used for late processing of noexcept-specifiers of member-functions.
+   DEFAULT_ARG is the unparsed operand of a noexcept-specifier which
+   we saved for later; parse it now.  */
+
+static tree
+cp_parser_late_noexcept_specifier (cp_parser *parser, tree default_arg)
+{
+  /* Make sure we've gotten something that hasn't been parsed yet.  */
+  gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (default_arg) == DEFAULT_ARG);
+
+  push_unparsed_function_queues (parser);
+
+  /* Push the saved tokens for the noexcept-specifier onto the parser's
+     lexer stack.  */
+  cp_token_cache *tokens = DEFARG_TOKENS (default_arg);
+  cp_parser_push_lexer_for_tokens (parser, tokens);
+
+  /* Parse the cached noexcept-specifier.  */
+  tree parsed_arg
+    = cp_parser_noexcept_specification_opt (parser,
+					    /*require_constexpr=*/true,
+					    NULL,
+					    /*return_cond=*/false);
+
+  /* Revert to the main lexer.  */
+  cp_parser_pop_lexer (parser);
+
+  /* Restore the queue.  */
+  pop_unparsed_function_queues (parser);
+
+  /* And we're done.  */
+  return parsed_arg;
+}
+
+/* Perform late checking of overriding function with respect to their
+   noexcept-specifiers.  TYPE is the class and FNDECL is the function
+   that potentially overrides some virtual function with the same
+   signature.  */
+
+static void
+noexcept_override_late_checks (tree type, tree fndecl)
+{
+  tree binfo = TYPE_BINFO (type);
+  tree base_binfo;
+
+  if (DECL_STATIC_FUNCTION_P (fndecl))
+    return;
+
+  for (int i = 0; BINFO_BASE_ITERATE (binfo, i, base_binfo); ++i)
+    {
+      tree basetype = BINFO_TYPE (base_binfo);
+
+      if (!TYPE_POLYMORPHIC_P (basetype))
+	continue;
+
+      tree fn = look_for_overrides_here (basetype, fndecl);
+      if (fn)
+	maybe_check_throw_specifier (fndecl, fn);
+    }
+}
+
 /* Parse an (optional) noexcept-specification.
 
    noexcept-specification:
@@ -25227,6 +25431,18 @@ cp_parser_noexcept_specification_opt (cp_parser* parser,
   if (cp_parser_is_keyword (token, RID_NOEXCEPT))
     {
       tree expr;
+
+      /* [class.mem]/6 says that a noexcept-specifer (within the
+	 member-specification of the class) is a complete-class context of
+	 a class.  So, if the noexcept-specifier has the optional expression,
+	 just save the tokens, and reparse this after we're done with the
+	 class.  */
+      if (cp_lexer_peek_nth_token (parser->lexer, 2)->type == CPP_OPEN_PAREN
+	  && at_class_scope_p ()
+	  && TYPE_BEING_DEFINED (current_class_type)
+	  && !LAMBDA_TYPE_P (current_class_type))
+	return cp_parser_save_noexcept (parser);
+
       cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
 
       if (cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer)->type == CPP_OPEN_PAREN)
@@ -28427,7 +28643,12 @@ cp_parser_save_member_function_body (cp_parser* parser,
       return error_mark_node;
     }
 
-  /* Remember it, if there default args to post process.  */
+  /* Remember if there is a noexcept-specifier to post process.  */
+  tree spec = TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (TREE_TYPE (fn));
+  if (UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (spec))
+    vec_safe_push (unparsed_noexcepts, fn);
+
+  /* Remember it, if there are default args to post process.  */
   cp_parser_save_default_args (parser, fn);
 
   /* Save away the tokens that make up the body of the
diff --git gcc/cp/parser.h gcc/cp/parser.h
index c03a9d87af5..2890788f489 100644
--- gcc/cp/parser.h
+++ gcc/cp/parser.h
@@ -166,6 +166,9 @@ struct GTY(()) cp_unparsed_functions_entry {
   /* Nested classes go in this vector, so that we can do some final
      processing after parsing any NSDMIs.  */
   vec<tree, va_gc> *classes;
+
+  /* Functions with noexcept-specifiers that require post-processing.  */
+  vec<tree, va_gc> *noexcepts;
 };
 
 
diff --git gcc/cp/pt.c gcc/cp/pt.c
index d6976e08690..c00d14fd954 100644
--- gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -25308,8 +25308,9 @@ dependent_type_p_r (tree type)
 	  if (tree noex = TREE_PURPOSE (spec))
 	    /* Treat DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT as non-dependent, since it doesn't
 	       affect overload resolution and treating it as dependent breaks
-	       things.  */
+	       things.  Same for an unparsed noexcept expression.  */
 	    if (TREE_CODE (noex) != DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT
+		&& TREE_CODE (noex) != DEFAULT_ARG
 		&& value_dependent_expression_p (noex))
 	      return true;
       return false;
diff --git gcc/cp/search.c gcc/cp/search.c
index 4c3fffda717..5a3a0cf2824 100644
--- gcc/cp/search.c
+++ gcc/cp/search.c
@@ -1863,6 +1863,39 @@ locate_field_accessor (tree basetype_path, tree field_decl, bool const_p)
 				   NULL, &lfd);
 }
 
+/* Check throw specifier of OVERRIDER is at least as strict as
+   the one of BASEFN.  */
+
+bool
+maybe_check_throw_specifier (tree overrider, tree basefn)
+{
+  maybe_instantiate_noexcept (basefn);
+  maybe_instantiate_noexcept (overrider);
+  tree base_throw = TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (TREE_TYPE (basefn));
+  tree over_throw = TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (TREE_TYPE (overrider));
+
+  if (DECL_INVALID_OVERRIDER_P (overrider))
+    return true;
+
+  /* Can't check this yet.  Pretend this is fine and let
+     noexcept_override_late_checks check this later.  */
+  if (UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (base_throw)
+      || UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (over_throw))
+    return true;
+
+  if (!comp_except_specs (base_throw, over_throw, ce_derived))
+    {
+      auto_diagnostic_group d;
+      error ("looser exception specification on overriding virtual function "
+	     "%q+#F", overrider);
+      inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (basefn),
+	      "overridden function is %q#F", basefn);
+      DECL_INVALID_OVERRIDER_P (overrider) = 1;
+      return false;
+    }
+  return true;
+}
+
 /* Check that virtual overrider OVERRIDER is acceptable for base function
    BASEFN. Issue diagnostic, and return zero, if unacceptable.  */
 
@@ -1873,7 +1906,6 @@ check_final_overrider (tree overrider, tree basefn)
   tree base_type = TREE_TYPE (basefn);
   tree over_return = fndecl_declared_return_type (overrider);
   tree base_return = fndecl_declared_return_type (basefn);
-  tree over_throw, base_throw;
 
   int fail = 0;
 
@@ -1957,21 +1989,8 @@ check_final_overrider (tree overrider, tree basefn)
       return 0;
     }
 
-  /* Check throw specifier is at least as strict.  */
-  maybe_instantiate_noexcept (basefn);
-  maybe_instantiate_noexcept (overrider);
-  base_throw = TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (TREE_TYPE (basefn));
-  over_throw = TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (TREE_TYPE (overrider));
-
-  if (!comp_except_specs (base_throw, over_throw, ce_derived))
-    {
-      auto_diagnostic_group d;
-      error ("looser throw specifier for %q+#F", overrider);
-      inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (basefn),
-	      "overridden function is %q#F", basefn);
-      DECL_INVALID_OVERRIDER_P (overrider) = 1;
-      return 0;
-    }
+  if (!maybe_check_throw_specifier (overrider, basefn))
+    return 0;
 
   /* Check for conflicting type attributes.  But leave transaction_safe for
      set_one_vmethod_tm_attributes.  */
diff --git gcc/cp/tree.c gcc/cp/tree.c
index 718eed349c6..bc0080d6720 100644
--- gcc/cp/tree.c
+++ gcc/cp/tree.c
@@ -2550,6 +2550,7 @@ canonical_eh_spec (tree raises)
   if (raises == NULL_TREE)
     return raises;
   else if (DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (raises)
+	   || UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (raises)
 	   || uses_template_parms (raises)
 	   || uses_template_parms (TREE_PURPOSE (raises)))
     /* Keep a dependent or deferred exception specification.  */
@@ -3662,6 +3663,7 @@ cp_tree_equal (tree t1, tree t2)
     case IDENTIFIER_NODE:
     case SSA_NAME:
     case USING_DECL:
+    case DEFAULT_ARG:
       return false;
 
     case BASELINK:
diff --git gcc/cp/typeck2.c gcc/cp/typeck2.c
index df002a1664c..8cbc48fb44f 100644
--- gcc/cp/typeck2.c
+++ gcc/cp/typeck2.c
@@ -2393,6 +2393,12 @@ merge_exception_specifiers (tree list, tree add)
   if (list == error_mark_node || add == error_mark_node)
     return error_mark_node;
 
+  /* We don't want to lose the unparsed operand lest we miss diagnostics.  */
+  if (UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (list))
+    return list;
+  else if (UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (add))
+    return add;
+
   /* No exception-specifier or noexcept(false) are less strict than
      anything else.  Prefer the newer variant (LIST).  */
   if (!list || list == noexcept_false_spec)
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept41.C gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept41.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..43b38c2446f
--- /dev/null
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept41.C
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+// PR c++/86476 - noexcept-specifier is a complete-class context
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+#define SA(X) static_assert(X, #X)
+
+struct S {
+  void f1() noexcept(noexcept(i)) { }
+  void f2() noexcept(noexcept(fn())) { }
+  void f3() noexcept(noexcept(fnx())) { }
+  void f4() noexcept(noexcept(i));
+  void f5() noexcept(noexcept(fn()));
+  void f6() noexcept(noexcept(fnx()));
+
+  void f7() noexcept(1);
+  void f8() noexcept(0);
+  void f9() noexcept(b);
+  void f10() noexcept(!b);
+
+  int i;
+  static constexpr auto b = true;
+  void fny() noexcept(noexcept(fn()));
+  void fn();
+  void fnx() noexcept;
+};
+
+S s;
+SA(noexcept(s.f1()));
+SA(!noexcept(s.f2()));
+SA(noexcept(s.f3()));
+SA(noexcept(s.f4()));
+SA(!noexcept(s.f5()));
+SA(noexcept(s.f6()));
+SA(noexcept(s.f7()));
+SA(!noexcept(s.f8()));
+SA(noexcept(s.f9()));
+SA(!noexcept(s.f10()));
+
+struct S2 {
+  struct V {
+    void f1() noexcept(noexcept(fn()));
+    void f2() noexcept(noexcept(fnx()));
+    void f3() noexcept(noexcept(fn())) { }
+    void f4() noexcept(noexcept(fnx())) { }
+    void fn();
+    void fnx() noexcept;
+  } v;
+  void fn();
+  void fnx();
+};
+
+S2 s2;
+SA(!noexcept(s2.v.f1()));
+SA(noexcept(s2.v.f2()));
+SA(!noexcept(s2.v.f3()));
+SA(noexcept(s2.v.f4()));
+
+struct S3 {
+  void f1() noexcept(noexcept(fn()));
+  void f2() noexcept(noexcept(fnx()));
+  void fn();
+  void fnx() noexcept;
+};
+
+void
+S3::f1() noexcept(noexcept(fn()))
+{
+}
+
+void
+S3::f2() noexcept(noexcept(fnx()))
+{
+}
+
+struct S4 {
+  int f1 (int p) noexcept(noexcept(p)) { return p; }
+  int f2 (int p) noexcept(noexcept(p));
+  int f3 (int p = 10) noexcept(noexcept(p));
+  int f4 () noexcept(noexcept(S4{}));
+};
+
+S4 s4;
+SA(noexcept(s4.f1(1)));
+SA(noexcept(s4.f2(1)));
+SA(noexcept(s4.f3()));
+SA(noexcept(s4.f4()));
+
+template<typename T>
+struct S5 {
+  void f1() noexcept(noexcept(i)) { }
+  void f2() noexcept(noexcept(fn())) { }
+  void f3() noexcept(noexcept(fnx())) { }
+  void f4() noexcept(noexcept(i));
+  void f5() noexcept(noexcept(fn()));
+  void f6() noexcept(noexcept(fnx()));
+    
+  int i;
+  void fny() noexcept(noexcept(fn()));
+  void fn();
+  void fnx() noexcept;
+};
+
+S5<int> s5;
+SA(noexcept(s5.f1()));
+SA(!noexcept(s5.f2()));
+SA(noexcept(s5.f3()));
+SA(noexcept(s5.f4()));
+SA(!noexcept(s5.f5()));
+SA(noexcept(s5.f6()));
+
+template<typename T>
+struct S6 {
+  void f1() noexcept(noexcept(x));
+  T x;
+};
+
+struct S7 {
+  template<typename U>
+  void f1 () noexcept(noexcept(U(1))) { }
+
+  template<int N>
+  void f2() noexcept(noexcept(N));
+
+  template <typename _Up>
+  void f3(_Up __p) noexcept(noexcept(__p));
+};
+
+void glob();
+void globx() noexcept;
+struct S8 {
+  void f1 () noexcept(noexcept(glob()));
+  void f2 () noexcept(noexcept(globx()));
+};
+
+S8 s8;
+SA(!noexcept(s8.f1()));
+SA(noexcept(s8.f2()));
+
+struct W {
+  constexpr operator bool();
+};
+
+template<typename T>
+struct S9 {
+  S9() noexcept(noexcept(w)) { }
+  S9 &operator=(S9 &&) noexcept(T::X);
+  W w;
+};
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept42.C gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept42.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b3859de9ebc
--- /dev/null
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept42.C
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// PR c++/86476 - noexcept-specifier is a complete-class context
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct S {
+  void f1() noexcept(noexcept(fn()));
+  void f2() noexcept(noexcept(fnx()));
+  void fn();
+  void fnx() noexcept;
+};
+
+void
+S::f1() noexcept // { dg-error "different exception specifier" }
+{
+}
+
+void
+S::f2() // { dg-error "different exception specifier" }
+{
+}
+
+struct S2 {
+  void f1() noexcept(noexcept(nosuchfn())); // { dg-error "not declared in this scope" }
+  void f2() noexcept(noexcept(nothere)); // { dg-error "not declared in this scope" }
+  void f3() noexcept(noexcept(nosuchfn())) { } // { dg-error "not declared in this scope" }
+  void f4() noexcept(noexcept(nothere)) { } // { dg-error "not declared in this scope" }
+};
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept43.C gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept43.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..12c6d364099
--- /dev/null
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept43.C
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// PR c++/86476 - noexcept-specifier is a complete-class context
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template <typename _Alloc> class A {
+  typedef _Alloc _Alloc_traits;
+  A &operator=(A &&) noexcept(_Alloc_traits::_S_nothrow_move);
+  A &m_fn1(A &&) noexcept(_Alloc_traits::_S_nothrow_move);
+  void m_fn2(A<char>) {}
+};
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept44.C gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept44.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a81032f28e9
--- /dev/null
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept44.C
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// PR c++/86476 - noexcept-specifier is a complete-class context
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+void fn1(void());
+template <typename> class A {
+  void _M_local_data();
+  A() noexcept(_M_local_data);
+};
+
+class B {
+  void _S_initialize();
+  static void _S_initialize_once();
+};
+void B::_S_initialize() { fn1(_S_initialize_once); }
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept45.C gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept45.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..39df4a6571e
--- /dev/null
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept45.C
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+// PR c++/86476 - noexcept-specifier is a complete-class context
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct A
+{
+  virtual void f();
+  virtual void g() noexcept;
+  virtual void h() noexcept(false);
+};
+
+struct B : A
+{
+  void f() noexcept(true);
+  void g() noexcept(true);
+  void h() noexcept(true);
+};
+
+struct D : A
+{
+  void f() noexcept(false);
+  void g() noexcept(false); // { dg-error "looser exception specification" }
+  void h() noexcept(false);
+};
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept46.C gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept46.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..da7490d651c
--- /dev/null
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept46.C
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// PR c++/86476 - noexcept-specifier is a complete-class context
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+void f() noexcept(false);
+void g() noexcept(true);
+void h() noexcept;
+
+struct B {
+  friend void f() noexcept(false);
+  friend void g() noexcept(false); // { dg-error "different exception specifier" }
+  friend void h() noexcept(false); // { dg-error "different exception specifier" }
+};
+
+struct C {
+  friend void f() noexcept(true); // { dg-error "different exception specifier" }
+  friend void g() noexcept(true); // { dg-error "different exception specifier" }
+  friend void h() noexcept(true); // { dg-error "different exception specifier" }
+};
+
+void o() noexcept(false);
+void p() noexcept(true);
+void q() noexcept;
+
+struct D {
+  friend void o() noexcept(true); // { dg-error "different exception specifier" }
+  friend void p() noexcept(true);
+  friend void q() noexcept(true);
+};
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/shadow1.C gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/shadow1.C
index 0ba6145ef0c..6bccc704d49 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/shadow1.C
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/shadow1.C
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ struct D : private B
 				// { dg-warning "deprecated" "" { target { c++11 && { ! c++17 } } } .-2 }
 struct E : public D
 {
-  virtual void V () throw (D); // { dg-error "looser throw" "" { target { ! c++17 } } }
+  virtual void V () throw (D); // { dg-error "looser exception" "" { target { ! c++17 } } }
 };			       // { dg-error "dynamic exception specification" "" { target c++17 } .-1 }
 			       // { dg-warning "deprecated" "" { target { c++11 && { ! c++17 } } } .-2 }
 B* foo (D *);

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-10 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-19 20:27 Marek Polacek
2019-01-04 14:45 ` Marek Polacek
2019-01-07 15:44 ` Jason Merrill
2019-05-10 19:21   ` Marek Polacek [this message]
2019-05-17 14:35     ` Marek Polacek
2019-05-24 16:17       ` Marek Polacek
2019-05-28 15:48     ` Jason Merrill
2019-06-04  1:02       ` Marek Polacek
2019-06-10 12:28         ` Marek Polacek
2019-06-12  3:46         ` Jason Merrill
2019-06-14 20:54           ` Marek Polacek
2019-06-21 20:47             ` Jason Merrill
2019-06-21 21:30               ` Marek Polacek
2019-06-22  0:28                 ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190510192133.GC20687@redhat.com \
    --to=polacek@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).