public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	       Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Add undocumented switch -mprefixed-addr
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 22:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190529213346.GX31586@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <098b3e26-96ea-401e-823c-300c1935287a@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 03:26:27PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> >> @@ -36379,6 +36391,7 @@ static struct rs6000_opt_mask const rs6000_opt_masks[] =
> >>    { "power9-vector",		OPTION_MASK_P9_VECTOR,		false, true  },
> >>    { "powerpc-gfxopt",		OPTION_MASK_PPC_GFXOPT,		false, true  },
> >>    { "powerpc-gpopt",		OPTION_MASK_PPC_GPOPT,		false, true  },
> >> +  { "prefixed-addr",		OPTION_MASK_PREFIXED_ADDR,	false, true  },
> > Do we want this?  Why?
> 
> Performance folks are using it for testing purposes.  Eventually this
> will probably drop out, but for now I think it's best to have the
> undocumented switch.

Command-line options, sure, but is that what this code is about?  Huh.
I thought it was for attribute target and that stuff.

Oh well, okay either way.  For now :-)


Segher

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-29 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-29 12:53 Bill Schmidt
2019-05-29 13:21 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-05-29 21:25   ` Bill Schmidt
2019-05-29 22:00     ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2019-05-30  0:57       ` [PATCH v2] " Bill Schmidt
2019-05-30 15:14         ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-05-30 16:16     ` [PATCH] " Michael Meissner
2019-06-02 23:01       ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190529213346.GX31586@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=meissner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wschmidt@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).