From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 100361 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2019 06:26:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 100329 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jul 2019 06:26:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:26:07 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x6M6Q5iM031055; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 01:26:05 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id x6M6Q4wZ031050; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 01:26:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:53:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool To: "Kewen.Lin" Cc: "Bin.Cheng" , gcc-patches List , Bill Schmidt , Richard Guenther Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PR80791 Consider doloop cmp use in ivopts Message-ID: <20190722062604.GA20882@gate.crashing.org> References: <1557803406-123657-1-git-send-email-linkw@linux.ibm.com> <2d897dc2-a01c-5005-6973-aad0c5930aa8@linux.ibm.com> <9d622cb7-2c1f-91bf-a61e-0239aa2ea8bf@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9d622cb7-2c1f-91bf-a61e-0239aa2ea8bf@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-07/txt/msg01375.txt.bz2 Hi! (Maybe I am missing half of the discussion -- sorry if so). I think we should have a new iv for just the doloop (which can have the same starting value and step and type as another iv). Has this been considered? Segher