From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66264 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2019 14:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 66181 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jul 2019 14:24:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:a4fe61b, H*i:sk:a4fe61b X-HELO: troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (HELO troutmask.apl.washington.edu) (128.95.76.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:24:15 +0000 Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6PEO9bJ042156 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Jul 2019 07:24:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x6PEO9E9042155; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 07:24:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:31:00 -0000 From: Steve Kargl To: Thomas Koenig Cc: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches Subject: Re: [patch, fortran] Improve dependency checking Message-ID: <20190725142409.GA42079@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) X-SW-Source: 2019-07/txt/msg01639.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 02:57:35PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Index: dependency.h > =================================================================== > --- dependency.h (Revision 273733) > +++ dependency.h (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ int gfc_check_fncall_dependency (gfc_expr *, sym_i > int gfc_check_dependency (gfc_expr *, gfc_expr *, bool); > int gfc_expr_is_one (gfc_expr *, int); > > -int gfc_dep_resolver(gfc_ref *, gfc_ref *, gfc_reverse *); > +int gfc_dep_resolver(gfc_ref *, gfc_ref *, gfc_reverse *, bool identical = false); This is changing the prototype. I would expect to see int gfc_dep_resolver(gfc_ref *, gfc_ref *, gfc_reverse *, bool); -- Steve