From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-506225-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 96671 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2019 12:54:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96640 invoked by uid 89); 5 Aug 2019 12:54:06 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:54:05 +0000
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A9D5C04BD48;	Mon,  5 Aug 2019 12:54:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-200.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.200])	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30709194B9;	Mon,  5 Aug 2019 12:54:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x75Cs1Xb001761;	Mon, 5 Aug 2019 14:54:02 +0200
Received: (from jakub@localhost)	by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x75CrwCq001333;	Mon, 5 Aug 2019 14:53:58 +0200
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:54:00 -0000
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,        "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC][x86] Fix PR91154, add SImode smax, allow SImode add in SSE regs
Message-ID: <20190805125358.GR2726@tucnak>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
References: <CAFULd4b9LXOZyqLSSS5mz1r7xe71LiwXFAgm5=VZFRLE57E2cw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1907311309240.19626@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <CAFULd4YHaEZsYn8Ym_F61QZ52hFyG4bRwJPU6y3qtSj39xRBuw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1908011122550.19626@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <CAFULd4YmJ1W1is5F3oJCMdk0uKUsLUr6wei8K7TsVrPygBBwgA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908031923130.5283@rguenther-XPS-13-9380> <CAFULd4ams5g7J0PwqDpn-cPZcVa9niTqw5_BWVzGg6MtcDi8sQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1908051316260.19626@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <CAFULd4Y9AHNpGyrsygqxQ6GtVeu5pyvQQt8Q7owHttuZFhbFbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFULd4ZgHw06-TLEJJbNr80V_UJ6yx7c_AGBoUpieKiTXT2V=g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFULd4ZgHw06-TLEJJbNr80V_UJ6yx7c_AGBoUpieKiTXT2V=g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00270.txt.bz2

On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 02:51:01PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > (define_mode_iterator MAXMIN_IMODE [SI "TARGET_SSE4_1"] [DI "TARGET_AVX512F"])
> >
> > and then we need to split DImode for 32bits, too.
> 
> For now, please add "TARGET_64BIT && TARGET_AVX512F" for DImode
> condition, I'll provide _doubleword splitter later.

Shouldn't that be TARGET_AVX512VL instead?  Or does the insn use %g0 etc.
to force use of %zmmN?

	Jakub