From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 49009 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2019 15:19:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 48964 invoked by uid 89); 10 Dec 2019 15:19:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=stl_algobaseh, stl_algobase.h, UD:stl_algobase.h, algos X-HELO: us-smtp-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) (207.211.31.120) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:19:39 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1575991178; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XDYHtFflCe9Ak/M19e3pbFnh4Rj9EK2+oNKGJiHpW14=; b=JKUCJmxyCTu3b+Bic0YKuiYK7l4hycwjW+2KBpzlsr8zIjDv9CwWAG/MDXUoYC9U9IMi7b P2n46JfVy4wk1mVT0N51AQWfaC2ZLdjZnEPI6qECnc+SoOlKUSrsGG5X4qPrV1fxcw9+lc M+L6R0L8/9fIgWwm4NncehqxPY4A+8k= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-413--DOz71znOn6Fn2SancmSfw-1; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:19:35 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF33E6B498; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.33.36.33]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA841001925; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:19:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Wakely To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Dumont Cc: "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches Subject: Re: copy/copy_backward/fill/fill_n/equal rework Message-ID: <20191210151932.GR11522@redhat.com> References: <1aba6050-85ae-8753-eb81-0ec76340e10b@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg00692.txt.bz2 On 09/12/19 10:32 +0100, Fran=E7ois Dumont wrote: >After completing this work and running more tests I realized that the=20 >declaration of algos was still not ideal. > >So here is another version where algos are not re-declare in=20 >stl_deque.h, I rather include stl_algobase.h in deque.tcc. The problem=20 >was spotted but another patch I am going to submit afterward. OK for trunk (with a suitable ChangeLog). Thanks for persisting with this, sorry it took so long.