From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11053 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2019 14:32:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11000 invoked by uid 89); 17 Dec 2019 14:32:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=recovery X-HELO: us-smtp-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) (207.211.31.120) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:32:04 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1576593122; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rrC8ncbhxKJx8GBDPK28XjjeFYENs5aYZbGn/0ZJX2E=; b=f2Eer0zWsuZBc64SFXoJQETrn0rcYQDRElmzWSnXHta+mMaySbBK9MYglcl4dHu9qPW73b 9/E2AVsJYp2lBE/x7rUn+DvCpRPUaOj/Mnz6aTc6x/+M1spJ/MChzhJtfpotmMiMuB1xl5 6DTr7+cKMqtkgPKUO0E9zQhj+SywRck= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-55-IZF4SicjNJy5x7WEwhKRIg-1; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 09:31:58 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4378B18B5F69 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-117-59.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.59]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C17B260BF1; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xBHEVsHx018006; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 15:31:55 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xBHEVrRG016510; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 15:31:53 +0100 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:33:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Jason Merrill Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: C++ Patch Ping (was Re: [C++ PATCH] Improve C++ error recovery (PR c++/59655)) Message-ID: <20191217143153.GE10088@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20191210210247.GH10088@tucnak> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191210210247.GH10088@tucnak> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg01194.txt.bz2 Hi! On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:02:47PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? > Or do you want to use an additional bit for that? >=20 > 2019-12-10 Jakub Jelinek >=20 > PR c++/59655 > * pt.c (push_tinst_level_loc): If limit_bad_template_recursion, > set TREE_NO_WARNING on tldcl. > * decl2.c (no_linkage_error): Treat templates with TREE_NO_WARNING > as defined during error recovery. >=20 > * g++.dg/cpp0x/diag3.C: New test. I'd like to ping this patch (or whether you want a special bit for it in addition to TREE_NO_WARNING). Thanks. Jakub