From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
Cc: "Eric S. Raymond" <esr@thyrsus.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
libstdc++ <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clean up references to Subversion in documentation sources.
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200113162121.GB60955@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f91720b-c6b3-533f-de39-26f200f5cc34@codesourcery.com>
On 13/01/20 09:09 -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>On 1/13/20 7:02 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>>Clean up references to SVN in in the GCC docs, redirecting to Git
>>documentation as appropriate.
>
>This is OK, although the set of changes for the libstdc++ manual like
>this gave me pause:
>
>>diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml
>>index 2b05ff6601a..cf5722377a6 100644
>>--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml
>>+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml
>>@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ This status table is based on the table of contents of ISO/IEC 14882:2003.
>> </para>
>> <para>
>>-This page describes the C++ support in mainline GCC SVN, not in any
>>+This page describes the C++ support in mainline GCC, not in any
>> particular release.
>> </para>
>
>IIUC the statements being modified here are incorrect; since the
>manuals are packaged with the GCC sources, they go in lock step with
>the source version, and the text of the manual describes the GCC
>version being built, not mainline. Perhaps the libstdc++
>documentation maintainers would like to correct this separately?
I did so on the gcc-7 branch, so it says "This page describes the
C++11 support in the GCC 7 series." I have forgotten to do that on the
gcc-8 and gcc-9 branches though, so they lie. I'll do that.
>For similar reasons, I suggest backporting this patch to all active
>GCC release branches, namely GCC 8 and GCC 9, so that manuals packaged
>with upcoming releases from those branches will correctly point to the
>GIT repository instead of SVN.
Agreed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-13 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-13 16:09 Eric S. Raymond
2020-01-13 16:21 ` Sandra Loosemore
2020-01-13 16:40 ` Joseph Myers
2020-01-13 17:35 ` Eric S. Raymond
2020-01-13 18:06 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-01-13 18:38 ` Eric S. Raymond
2020-01-27 20:11 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-20 4:40 ` Sandra Loosemore
2020-01-20 23:05 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-01-13 17:12 ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2020-01-13 17:27 ` Jonathan Wakely
2020-01-14 11:46 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2020-01-15 21:52 ` Jonathan Wakely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200113162121.GB60955@redhat.com \
--to=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=esr@thyrsus.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=sandra@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).