From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 62781 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2020 13:01:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31325 invoked by uid 89); 19 Feb 2020 13:00:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: us-smtp-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) (205.139.110.120) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:00:25 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1582117218; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YqV6nlEM7l6XAL8epZtZNNLQVDNdF0YP6eXYql/QZUg=; b=aua3f/MrzeBUOVXYlA9y6+9TdsO2OBIuvHZEkNjhm5hWFOvl2P/zyWqgfXdTgjVNkj1RKC /0+ytnCVPhQK9XU/GZ2y6AEzDMIaijewBK/ewX13hY32ZwMEkh+nys6vS3UHUtczhx9PAq 1osovT/PosWGUaHTA3C7d40XGm+t1wo= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-4-JURIxIWEP6eqEJxj7ODQnQ-1; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 08:00:16 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A7A718CA247; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.33.36.6]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C365C241; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:01:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Wakely To: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [committed] libstdc++: Implement LWG issues 3398, 3379, 3304, 3321, 3280, 3335 Message-ID: <20200219130013.GN9441@redhat.com> References: <20200219124722.GM9441@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200219124722.GM9441@redhat.com> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg01097.txt.bz2 On 19/02/20 12:47 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >Add ranges_size_t and rename all_view (LWG 3335) >Remove converting constructors from views (LWG 3280) >uninitialized_construct_using_allocator should use construct_at (LWG 3321) >Add nodiscard to polymorphic_allocator members (LWG 3304) >"safe" in several library names is misleading (LWG 3379) >tuple_element_t is also wrong for const subrange (LWG 3398) > >Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to master. Oops, the attached patch also included three other commits that weren't mine (but were already committed).