From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 94369 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2020 02:10:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 94355 invoked by uid 89); 2 Mar 2020 02:10:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=Sure, H*i:sk:1e69acf, H*MI:sk:1e69acf, H*f:sk:1e69acf X-HELO: troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (HELO troutmask.apl.washington.edu) (128.95.76.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 02:10:06 +0000 Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0222A4Un065873 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 1 Mar 2020 18:10:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0222A3Tf065872; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 18:10:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 02:10:00 -0000 From: Steve Kargl To: Thomas Koenig Cc: Andrew Benson , fortran@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [patch, fortran] PR93486 - ICE on valid with nested submodules and long submodule names Message-ID: <20200302021003.GA65843@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <2861300.JBue2MTAIU@andrew-precision-3520> <5143379.kh7g2yUdUI@andrew-precision-3520> <20200301224213.GA65190@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <1e69acf8-b3a3-4e2a-12f9-5d2603d34e54@netcologne.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1e69acf8-b3a3-4e2a-12f9-5d2603d34e54@netcologne.de> X-SW-Source: 2020-03/txt/msg00015.txt On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 11:43:23PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Am 01.03.20 um 23:42 schrieb Steve Kargl: > > PS: in general, after multiple > > pings, just commit the patch. > > ... well, maybe after a "If there is no reply within a > couple of days, I will commit this" :-) > Andrew submitted the patch and pinged it twice. gfortran development is running on fumes. Beating one's head against a wall seems counter productive. I'm operating on a principle that if one has commit access for gfortran, one is committing a patch with the best attentions. Could this lead to a regression? Sure. The alternative of constantly pinging patches is to simply stop submitting patches. -- Steve