From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8390 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2020 13:35:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8374 invoked by uid 89); 2 Mar 2020 13:35:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*i:sk:cba9b44, H*f:sk:cba9b44, H*MI:sk:cba9b44, lap X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 13:35:11 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 022DYs2r025668; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 07:34:54 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 022DYrcR025667; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 07:34:53 -0600 Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 13:35:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" Cc: Nathan Sidwell , Gerald Pfeifer , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, GCC Development Subject: Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Message-ID: <20200302133453.GJ22482@gate.crashing.org> References: <353faf3e-bf43-eb4d-542d-45a53dce77b2@arm.com> <91e48c52-4548-089b-707a-afd400001dac@arm.com> <1d2b74eb-842b-29a7-2abd-e2b34e12315c@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-03/txt/msg00039.txt On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 01:01:46PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > I'd like to. But have we reached consensus? Seems that every time I > produce a revised version of the text we end up in another round of bike > shedding. (Is that a word?) It's called a "lap", but "criterium" would be more suitable here. Segher