public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
	"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] c/94392 - only enable -ffinite-loops for C++
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 17:56:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200401155632.GB53791@kam.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2004011549340.830@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>

> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 03:36:30PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > @@ -512,7 +512,10 @@ can_inline_edge_by_limits_p (struct cgraph_edge *e, bool report,
> > >  	      /* When devirtualization is disabled for callee, it is not safe
> > >  		 to inline it as we possibly mangled the type info.
> > >  		 Allow early inlining of always inlines.  */
> > > -	      || (!early && check_maybe_down (flag_devirtualize)))
> > > +	      || (!early && check_maybe_down (flag_devirtualize))
> > > +	      /* It's not safe to inline a function where loops maybe
> > > +		 infinite into a function where we assume the reverse.  */
> > > +	      || check_maybe_down (flag_finite_loops))
> > >  	{
> > >  	  e->inline_failed = CIF_OPTIMIZATION_MISMATCH;
> > >  	  inlinable = false;
> > 
> > Couldn't the above care only if the function has any loops?
> > Otherwise, won't it prevent cross-language LTO inlining too much?
> > Or instead of disabling inlining arrange for a safe flag_finite_loops value
> > for the resulting function (set some flag in cfun of the function that would
> > be considered together with flag_finite_loops (so that we don't have to
> > create further OPTIMIZATION_NODEs) and disable finite loops opts if we've
> > inlined !flag_finite_loops function into flag_finite_loops one)?
> 
> I guess I can split out this hunk from the patch - it's a separate
> issue affecting also C++ with mixed option CUs.  Yes, ideally we'd
> simply initialize loop->finite_p from flag_finite_loops at CFG
> construction time and then only ever check the flag on the loop
> structure.  That would leave us with infinite loops for loops
> we only discover later though.  It also opens up the possibility
> of a per-loop #pragma.

We do want to preserve cross-module inlining between C and C++, so we
really should go with marking the loops pre-inline about finiteness and
try to preserve the info, otherwise we are going to lose quite some
optimizations.

Honza
> 
> Richard.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-01 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-17  4:17 [PATCH] Remove empty loop with assumed finiteness (PR tree-optimization/89713) Feng Xue OS
2019-05-17 16:47 ` Jeff Law
2019-05-17 18:50   ` Richard Biener
2019-05-18 14:00     ` Marc Glisse
2019-05-20  7:50       ` Richard Biener
2019-05-20  8:27         ` Feng Xue OS
2019-05-20  9:19           ` Richard Biener
2019-05-20  9:48             ` Feng Xue OS
2019-05-20 11:54               ` Richard Biener
2019-05-20 14:00                 ` Feng Xue OS
2019-05-20 14:04                   ` Richard Biener
2019-05-20 14:51                     ` Feng Xue OS
2019-05-21 10:12                       ` Richard Biener
2019-05-21 14:24                         ` Richard Biener
2019-05-22 13:44                           ` Michael Matz
2019-05-24 16:02                             ` [PATCH V3] " Feng Xue OS
2019-05-24  9:15                           ` [PATCH V2] " Feng Xue OS
2019-05-29 11:16                             ` Richard Biener
2019-06-04  6:49                               ` [PATCH V4] " Feng Xue OS
2019-06-04  8:24                                 ` Marc Glisse
2019-06-04 15:16                                   ` [PATCH V5] " Feng Xue OS
2019-06-04 15:24                                     ` [PATCH V6] " Feng Xue OS
2019-06-05 11:05                                       ` Richard Biener
2019-06-06 10:00                                         ` [PATCH V7] " Feng Xue OS
2019-06-11  2:40                                           ` [PATCH V8] " Feng Xue OS
2019-06-12  9:43                                             ` Richard Biener
2019-06-15 12:05                                               ` [committed][nvptx, libgomp] Update pr85381-{2,4}.c test-cases Tom de Vries
2019-05-20 13:04         ` [PATCH] Remove empty loop with assumed finiteness (PR tree-optimization/89713) Marc Glisse
2019-05-20 13:26           ` Richard Biener
2019-05-20 14:49             ` Michael Matz
2019-05-21  8:06               ` Marc Glisse
2020-04-01 13:36 ` [PATCH][RFC] c/94392 - only enable -ffinite-loops for C++ Richard Biener
2020-04-01 13:47   ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-04-01 13:52     ` Richard Biener
2020-04-01 15:56       ` Jan Hubicka [this message]
2020-04-01 16:59         ` Richard Biener
2020-04-01 19:15   ` Jason Merrill
2020-04-02  9:12     ` Richard Biener
2020-04-02  9:17       ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-04-02  9:41         ` Richard Biener
2020-04-03  8:29       ` Revert "[nvptx, libgomp] Update pr85381-{2, 4}.c test-cases" [PR89713, PR94392] (was: [PATCH][RFC] c/94392 - only enable -ffinite-loops for C++) Thomas Schwinge
2020-04-03  9:36         ` Revert "[nvptx, libgomp] Update pr85381-{2,4}.c " Richard Biener
2020-04-03 10:34           ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-10-30 14:09           ` Revert "[nvptx, libgomp] Update pr85381-{2, 4}.c " Thomas Schwinge
2020-10-30 14:16             ` Revert "[nvptx, libgomp] Update pr85381-{2,4}.c " Jakub Jelinek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200401155632.GB53791@kam.mff.cuni.cz \
    --to=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).