public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: luoxhu <luoxhu@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, wschmidt@linux.ibm.com,
	guojiufu@linux.ibm.com, linkw@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Don't split constant oprator when add, move to temp register for future optimization
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 16:08:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200403210852.GK26902@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <596ce54a-996c-3180-dbf1-df5e94ded4cb@linux.ibm.com>

Hi!

On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 02:13:06PM +0800, luoxhu wrote:
> Currently 286r.split2 will split "12:%9:DI=0x87654321" to lis+ori by
> rs6000_emit_set_const of define_split, do you mean add new define_insn_and_split
> to do the split?  Another patch to do this after this one goes upstream in stage 1?

I mean a splitter that recognises
  reg := reg + imm
for a big immediate, and then does addis+addi again if that is the best
way to do it.

We expand as a load of the 32-bit constant, which means it can be hoisted
just fine, and when we can use paddi we can; but when we cannot, we can
still split it again.

> > This also links in with Alan's work on big immediates, and with paddi
> > insns, etc.
> 
> Seems PR94393?

Yes, PR94393.  And everything else that will show up if we start pulling
at that string (which we should now, btw, for paddi).


Segher

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-03 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-26 10:06 luoxhu
2020-03-26 15:18 ` will schmidt
2020-03-27 14:33 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-03-30  3:59   ` luoxhu
2020-04-02 22:16     ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-04-03  6:13       ` luoxhu
2020-04-03 12:13         ` Alan Modra
2020-04-03 21:11           ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-04-03 23:51             ` Alan Modra
2020-04-07 21:47               ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-04-03 21:08         ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200403210852.GK26902@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=guojiufu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linkw@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=luoxhu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wschmidt@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).