From: Jozef Lawrynowicz <jozef.l@mittosystems.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, richard.sandiford@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] expr: Allow scalar_int_mode target mode when converting a constant
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:48:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200722094855.dbpua4635rmncz2d@jozef-acer-manjaro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mptd04ouexg.fsf@arm.com>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 09:33:47AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Jozef Lawrynowicz <jozef.l@mittosystems.com> writes:
> > is_int_mode does not allow MODE_PARTIAL_INT modes, so convert_modes was
> > not allowing a constant value to be converted to a MODE_PARTIAL_INT for
> > use as operand 2 in patterns such as ashlpsi3. The constant had
> > to be copied into a register before it could be used, but now can be
> > used directly as an operand without any copying.
>
> Yeah. I guess this dates back to when MODE_PARTIAL_INTs didn't have
> a known precision.
Is that what the section on MODE_PARTIAL_INT in the description for the
"subreg" RTX refers to? From "14.8 Registers and Memory" of gccint:
A MODE_PARTIAL_INT mode behaves as if it were as wide as the corresponding
MODE_INT mode, except that it has an unknown number of undefined bits.
If so, that whole section seems out of date. I can work on getting it
fixed up.
>
> > diff --git a/gcc/expr.c b/gcc/expr.c
> > index c7c3e9fd655..5a252f0935f 100644
> > --- a/gcc/expr.c
> > +++ b/gcc/expr.c
> > @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ convert_modes (machine_mode mode, machine_mode oldmode, rtx x, int unsignedp)
> > return x;
> >
> > if (CONST_SCALAR_INT_P (x)
> > - && is_int_mode (mode, &int_mode))
> > + && is_a <scalar_int_mode> (mode, &int_mode))
> > {
> > /* If the caller did not tell us the old mode, then there is not
> > much to do with respect to canonicalization. We have to
>
> I think we also need to change the condition in:
>
> /* If the caller did not tell us the old mode, then there is not
> much to do with respect to canonicalization. We have to
> assume that all the bits are significant. */
> if (GET_MODE_CLASS (oldmode) != MODE_INT)
>
> to is_a <scalar_int_mode> (old_mode)
>
> OK with that, thanks.
Thanks, I'll regtest that change and apply if all looks good.
Jozef
>
> Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-22 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-21 18:17 [PATCH 0/3] MSP430: Improve code-generation for shift instructions Jozef Lawrynowicz
2020-07-21 18:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] expr: Allow scalar_int_mode target mode when converting a constant Jozef Lawrynowicz
2020-07-22 8:33 ` Richard Sandiford
2020-07-22 9:48 ` Jozef Lawrynowicz [this message]
2020-07-24 14:14 ` Richard Sandiford
2020-07-21 18:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] expmed: Fix possible use of NULL_RTX return value from emit_store_flag Jozef Lawrynowicz
2020-07-22 8:38 ` Richard Sandiford
2020-07-21 18:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] MSP430: Simplify and extend shift instruction patterns Jozef Lawrynowicz
2020-08-07 10:55 ` ping " Jozef Lawrynowicz
2020-08-25 19:16 ` Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200722094855.dbpua4635rmncz2d@jozef-acer-manjaro \
--to=jozef.l@mittosystems.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).