Re: [RS6000] PR96493, powerpc local call linkage failure

[Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>]

Hi Alan,

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 06:38:53PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> This fixes a fail when power10 isn't supported by binutils, and
> ensures the test isn't run without power10 hardware or simulation on
> the off chance that power10 insns are emitted in the future for this
> testcase.

The testcases said it wanted power8, so why did it fail?  GCC shouldn't
use anything that requires p10 support in binutils then, or what do I
miss here?


Segher


> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr96493.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr96493.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> -/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-do run { target { power10_hw } } } */
> +/* { dg-do link { target { ! power10_hw } } } */
>  /* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power8 -O2" } */
>  /* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_elfv2 } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target power10_ok } */
>  
>  /* Test local calls between pcrel and non-pcrel code.
>