From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Add DWARF5 variants of assembly scan tests that use DW_FORM_implicit_const
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:44:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200824174427.GO2363@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200824125658.22526-4-mark@klomp.org>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 02:56:56PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Some DWARF tests scan the assembly output looking for constant values.
> When using DWARF5 those constants might use DW_FORM_implicit_const,
> which are output (in the comments) after the attribute instead of
> before. To make sure these tests work introduce a -gdwarf-5 variant
> of these tests and explicitly use -gdwarf-2 for the original.
I just wonder if we want to use -gdwarf-2 rather than -gdwarf-4 in the
original, -gdwarf-5 has been the default for a couple of years and thus
that is what those testshave been compiled with.
Also not sure about the -dwarf5 suffixes, couldn't we say just use
pr41445-{7,8}.c, inline-var-2.C or inline3.c (or whatever next number
with the same prefix is still unused)?
> ---
> .../dwarf2/{inline-var-1.C => inline-var-1-dwarf5.C} | 6 ++++--
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1.C | 2 +-
> .../gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/{inline2.c => inline2-dwarf5.c} | 7 ++++---
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c | 4 +++-
> .../debug/dwarf2/{pr41445-5.c => pr41445-5-dwarf5.c} | 8 ++++----
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5.c | 2 +-
> .../debug/dwarf2/{pr41445-6.c => pr41445-6-dwarf5.c} | 8 ++++----
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6.c | 2 +-
> 8 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> copy gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/{inline-var-1.C => inline-var-1-dwarf5.C} (76%)
> copy gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/{inline2.c => inline2-dwarf5.c} (88%)
> copy gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/{pr41445-5.c => pr41445-5-dwarf5.c} (73%)
> copy gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/{pr41445-6.c => pr41445-6-dwarf5.c} (68%)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1-dwarf5.C
> similarity index 76%
> copy from gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1.C
> copy to gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1-dwarf5.C
> index 3b1c913edfca..52ed5b6912fd 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1.C
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1-dwarf5.C
> @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
> +// DWARF5 variant of inline-var-1.C
> // { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
> -// { dg-options "-O -g -dA -gno-strict-dwarf -fno-eliminate-unused-debug-symbols" }
> +// { dg-options "-O -gdwarf-5 -dA -gno-strict-dwarf -fno-eliminate-unused-debug-symbols" }
> // { dg-require-weak "" }
> -// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x3\[^\n\r]* DW_AT_inline" 6 { xfail *-*-aix* } } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times " DW_AT_inline \\(0x3\\)" 2 { xfail *-*-aix* } } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x3\[^\n\r]* DW_AT_inline" 4 { xfail *-*-aix* } } }
> // { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x1\[^\n\r]* DW_AT_inline" 2 { xfail *-*-aix* } } }
> // { dg-final { scan-assembler-times " DW_AT_declaration" 6 { xfail *-*-aix* } } }
> // { dg-final { scan-assembler-times " DW_AT_specification" 6 { xfail *-*-aix* } } }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1.C
> index 3b1c913edfca..9a88e28cbe0f 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1.C
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-var-1.C
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> // { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
> -// { dg-options "-O -g -dA -gno-strict-dwarf -fno-eliminate-unused-debug-symbols" }
> +// { dg-options "-O -gdwarf-2 -dA -gno-strict-dwarf -fno-eliminate-unused-debug-symbols" }
> // { dg-require-weak "" }
> // { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x3\[^\n\r]* DW_AT_inline" 6 { xfail *-*-aix* } } }
> // { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x1\[^\n\r]* DW_AT_inline" 2 { xfail *-*-aix* } } }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2-dwarf5.c
> similarity index 88%
> copy from gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c
> copy to gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2-dwarf5.c
> index 7e019a6c06a0..03013f11bca8 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2-dwarf5.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/* Contributed by Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com>
> +/* DWARF5 variant of inline2.
> Origin: PR debug/37801
>
> Abstract instances (DW_TAG_subroutines having the DW_AT_inline attribute)
> @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
> properly nested DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine DIEs for third, second and first.
> */
>
> -/* { dg-options "-O -g3 -gdwarf -dA -fgnu89-inline" } */
> +/* Explicitly use dwarf-5 which uses DW_FORM_implicit_const. */
> +/* { dg-options "-O -g3 -gdwarf-5 -dA -fgnu89-inline" } */
> /* { dg-do compile } */
>
> /* There are 6 inlined subroutines:
> @@ -32,7 +33,7 @@
> /* There are 3 DW_AT_inline attributes: one per abstract inline instance.
> The value of the attribute must be 0x3, meaning the function was
> actually inlined. */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "(?:byte|data1)\[^\n\]*0x3\[^\n\]* DW_AT_inline" 3 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times " DW_AT_inline \\(0x3\\)" 3 } } */
>
> volatile int *a;
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c
> index 7e019a6c06a0..9c36450ae2de 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@
> properly nested DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine DIEs for third, second and first.
> */
>
> -/* { dg-options "-O -g3 -gdwarf -dA -fgnu89-inline" } */
> +/* Explicitly use dwarf-2 because dwarf-5 might use DW_FORM_implicit_const
> + which is hard to scan for. */
> +/* { dg-options "-O -g3 -gdwarf-2 -dA -fgnu89-inline" } */
> /* { dg-do compile } */
>
> /* There are 6 inlined subroutines:
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5-dwarf5.c
> similarity index 73%
> copy from gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5.c
> copy to gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5-dwarf5.c
> index d646f5983b30..0e0de822d806 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5-dwarf5.c
> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
> -/* PR preprocessor/41445 */
> +/* PR preprocessor/41445 DWARF5 variant */
> /* Test that token after multi-line function-like macro use
> gets correct locus even when preprocessing separately. */
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-save-temps -gdwarf -O0 -dA -fno-merge-debug-strings" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-save-temps -gdwarf-5 -O0 -dA -fno-merge-debug-strings" } */
>
> #define A(x) vari x
> #define vari(x)
> @@ -12,5 +12,5 @@ int A(B) ;
> /* We want to check that both vari and varj have the same line
> number. */
>
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "DW_TAG_variable\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\"vari\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_name(\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_)*\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\[^0-9a-fA-FxX](0xa|10)\[^0-9a-fA-FxX]\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_decl_line" } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "DW_TAG_variable\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\"varj\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_name(\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_)*\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\[^0-9a-fA-FxX](0xa|10)\[^0-9a-fA-FxX]\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_decl_line" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "DW_TAG_variable\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\"vari\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_name(\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_)*\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_decl_line \\((0xa|10)\\)" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "DW_TAG_variable\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\"varj\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_name(\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_)*\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_decl_line \\((0xa|10)\\)" } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5.c
> index d646f5983b30..80300ec22e87 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-5.c
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> /* Test that token after multi-line function-like macro use
> gets correct locus even when preprocessing separately. */
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-save-temps -gdwarf -O0 -dA -fno-merge-debug-strings" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-save-temps -gdwarf-2 -O0 -dA -fno-merge-debug-strings" } */
>
> #define A(x) vari x
> #define vari(x)
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6-dwarf5.c
> similarity index 68%
> copy from gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6.c
> copy to gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6-dwarf5.c
> index 340cb3835307..3a6eeb530968 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6-dwarf5.c
> @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
> -/* PR preprocessor/41445 */
> +/* PR preprocessor/41445 DWARF5 variant*/
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-gdwarf -O0 -dA -fno-merge-debug-strings" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-gdwarf-5 -O0 -dA -fno-merge-debug-strings" } */
>
> #include "pr41445-5.c"
>
> /* We want to check that both vari and varj have the same line
> number. */
>
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "DW_TAG_variable\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\"vari\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_name(\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_)*\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\[^0-9a-fA-FxX](0xa|10)?\[^0-9a-fA-FxX]\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_decl_line" } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "DW_TAG_variable\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\"varj\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_name(\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_)*\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\[^0-9a-fA-FxX](0xa|10)\[^0-9a-fA-FxX]\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_decl_line" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "DW_TAG_variable\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\"vari\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_name(\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_)*\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_decl_line \\((0xa|10)\\)" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "DW_TAG_variable\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\"varj\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_name(\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_)*\[^\\r\\n\]*\[\\r\\n\]+\[^\\r\\n\]*\[^\\r\\n\]*DW_AT_decl_line \\((0xa|10)\\)" } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6.c
> index 340cb3835307..fbf033758b6b 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr41445-6.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> /* PR preprocessor/41445 */
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-gdwarf -O0 -dA -fno-merge-debug-strings" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-gdwarf-2 -O0 -dA -fno-merge-debug-strings" } */
>
> #include "pr41445-5.c"
>
> --
> 2.18.4
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-24 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-24 12:56 BoF DWARF5 patches Mark Wielaard
2020-08-24 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] Don't enable -gvariable-location-views by default for DWARF5 Mark Wielaard
2020-08-24 17:38 ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-08-24 20:12 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-08-25 4:05 ` Alexandre Oliva
2020-08-25 7:27 ` Richard Biener
2020-08-25 9:24 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-08-26 12:22 ` Alexandre Oliva
2020-09-29 11:15 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-08-24 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] Make sure that static data member constexpr isn't optimized away in test Mark Wielaard
2020-08-24 17:40 ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-08-24 20:17 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-08-24 20:59 ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-24 21:38 ` Jason Merrill
2020-08-25 9:19 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-09-01 18:46 ` Jason Merrill
2021-02-09 19:40 ` Jason Merrill
2021-02-09 19:55 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-02-09 23:15 ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-08-25 12:41 ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-08-24 12:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] Add DWARF5 variants of assembly scan tests that use DW_FORM_implicit_const Mark Wielaard
2020-08-24 17:44 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2020-08-24 20:26 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-09-17 16:03 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-09-17 16:45 ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-08-24 12:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] Default to DWARF5 Mark Wielaard
2020-08-24 12:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] Add --gdwarf-5 to ASM_SPEC Mark Wielaard
2020-08-26 21:37 ` Duplicate .debug_lines (Was: [PATCH 5/5] Add --gdwarf-5 to ASM_SPEC) Mark Wielaard
2020-08-26 23:38 ` H.J. Lu
2020-08-29 12:23 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-08-29 14:34 ` H.J. Lu
2020-08-29 15:23 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-08-29 15:43 ` H.J. Lu
2020-08-29 16:32 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-08-29 16:44 ` H.J. Lu
2020-08-29 17:32 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-09-07 12:37 ` [PATCH] gas: Don't error when .debug_line already exists, unless .loc was used Mark Wielaard
2020-08-25 9:32 ` BoF DWARF5 patches Mark Wielaard
2020-09-09 19:57 ` BoF DWARF5 patches (25% .debug section size reduction) Mark Wielaard
2020-09-10 11:16 ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-09-10 11:45 ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-09-15 18:40 ` [PATCH] debug: Pass --gdwarf-N to assembler if fixed gas is detected during configure Jakub Jelinek
2020-09-16 12:33 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-09-16 13:31 ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-09-18 15:21 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-10-06 15:54 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-10-06 20:57 ` Jason Merrill
2020-10-07 11:29 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-09-29 13:56 ` BoF DWARF5 patches (25% .debug section size reduction) Mark Wielaard
2020-11-15 22:41 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-01-15 16:16 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-01-18 10:19 ` Sebastian Huber
2021-01-18 11:18 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-11-17 0:19 ` Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200824174427.GO2363@tucnak \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=mark@klomp.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).