From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A00385DC2E
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:13:12 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 48A00385DC2E
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=kernel.crashing.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=segher@kernel.crashing.org
Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 08UKC5KG001082;
 Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:12:05 -0500
Received: (from segher@localhost)
 by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 08UKC4XX001081;
 Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:12:04 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to
 segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:12:04 -0500
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, joseph@codesourcery.com,
 ". Jakub Jelinek" <jakub@redhat.com>,
 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] builtins: (not just) rs6000: Add builtins for
 fegetround, feclearexcept and feraiseexcept [PR94193]
Message-ID: <20200930201204.GZ28786@gate.crashing.org>
References: <20200904155230.nyssphhldu47hbve@work-tp>
 <20200929233806.GW28786@gate.crashing.org>
 <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2009300901280.10073@p653.nepu.fhfr.qr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2009300901280.10073@p653.nepu.fhfr.qr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS, TXREP, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR,
 T_SPF_PERMERROR autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:13:13 -0000

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 09:02:34AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2020, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > I don't see much about optabs in the docs either.  Add some text to
> > optabs.def itself then?
> 
> All optabs are documented in doc/md.texi as 'instruction patterns'

Except for what seems to be the majority that isn't.

> This is where new optabs need to be documented.

It's going to be challenging to find a reasonable spot in there.
Oh well.

Thanks,


Segher