From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FDA38930C6 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:36:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 61FDA38930C6 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=segher@kernel.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 09QCZK2T019330; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:35:20 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 09QCZKG3019329; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:35:20 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:35:20 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Alan Modra Cc: David Edelsohn , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [RS6000] Tests that use int128_t and -m32 Message-ID: <20201026123520.GV2672@gate.crashing.org> References: <20201025112001.GC15956@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20201026120420.GI15956@bubble.grove.modra.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201026120420.GI15956@bubble.grove.modra.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, TXREP, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR, T_SPF_PERMERROR autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:36:22 -0000 On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 10:34:20PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:43:12AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > > Another problem with all of the vsx_mask test cases is that they use > > -mcpu=power10 instead of -mdejagnu-cpu=power10. Can you follow up > > with that fix or do you want me to? > > Sure, I can do that if you're pre-approving the patch. > gcc.target/powerpc/pr93122.c too. This is obvious and trivial, doesn't need approval (just send a mail what you did). Thanks :-) Segher