From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113D33857C52 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:08:29 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 113D33857C52 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-41-s9rJzR7iOk2Rbdlht_WY9A-1; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:08:26 -0500 X-MC-Unique: s9rJzR7iOk2Rbdlht_WY9A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CF971891E8A; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-113-127.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.127]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8D907366D; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 0ABI8M8a3776030 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 19:08:23 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 0ABI8Mve3776029; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 19:08:22 +0100 Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 19:08:22 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Florian Weimer Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Ensure __gthread_self doesn't call undefined weak symbol [PR 95989] Message-ID: <20201111180822.GR3788@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20201111172442.GA163354@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201111172442.GA163354@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:08:30 -0000 On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 05:24:42PM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > --- a/libgcc/gthr-posix.h > +++ b/libgcc/gthr-posix.h > @@ -684,7 +684,14 @@ __gthread_equal (__gthread_t __t1, __gthread_t __t2) > static inline __gthread_t > __gthread_self (void) > { > +#if __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 27) What if it is a non-glibc system where __GLIBC_PREREQ macro isn't defined? I think you'd get then error: missing binary operator before token "(" So I think you want #if defined __GLIBC__ && defined __GLIBC_PREREQ #if __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 27) return pthread_self (); #else return __gthrw_(pthread_self) (); #else return __gthrw_(pthread_self) (); #endif or similar. Jakub