public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH] c++: ICE with deferred noexcept when deducing targs [PR82099]
Date: Mon,  4 Jan 2021 20:31:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210105013118.692897-1-polacek@redhat.com> (raw)

In this test we ICE in type_throw_all_p because it got a deferred
noexcept which it shouldn't.  Here's the story:

In noexcept61.C, we call bar, so we perform overload resolution.  When
adding the (only) candidate, we need to deduce template arguments, so
call fn_type_unification as usually.  That deduces U to

  void (*) (int &, int &)

which is correct, but its noexcept-spec is deferred_noexcept.  Then
we call add_function_candidate (bar), wherein we try to create an
implicit conversion sequence for every argument.  Since baz<int> is
of unknown type, we instantiate_type it; it is a TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR
so that calls resolve_address_of_overloaded_function.  But we crash
there, because target_type contains the deferred_noexcept.

So we need to maybe_instantiate_noexcept before we can compare types.
resolve_overloaded_unification seemed like the appropriate spot, now
fn_type_unification produces the function type with its noexcept-spec
instantiated.  This shouldn't go against CWG 1330 because here we
really need to instantiate the noexcept-spec.

This also fixes class-deduction76.C, a dg-ice test I recently added,
therefore this fix also fixes c++/90799, yay.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	PR c++/82099
	* pt.c (resolve_overloaded_unification): Call
	maybe_instantiate_noexcept after instantiating the function
	decl.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR c++/82099
	* g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction76.C: Remove dg-ice.
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept61.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/pt.c                                    |  3 +++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept61.C        | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction76.C |  1 -
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept61.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index 062ef858501..0d061adc2ed 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -22373,6 +22373,9 @@ resolve_overloaded_unification (tree tparms,
 		  --function_depth;
 		}
 
+	      if (flag_noexcept_type)
+		maybe_instantiate_noexcept (fn, tf_none);
+
 	      elem = TREE_TYPE (fn);
 	      if (try_one_overload (tparms, targs, tempargs, parm,
 				    elem, strict, sub_strict, addr_p, explain_p)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept61.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept61.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..653cd7e6680
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept61.C
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// PR c++/82099
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template <typename T, typename U>
+void bar (T &x, T &y, U u)
+{
+  u (x, y);
+}
+
+template <typename T>
+void baz (T &x, T &y) noexcept (noexcept (x == y));
+
+void
+foo (int x, int y)
+{
+  bar (x, y, baz<int>);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction76.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction76.C
index 23bb6e8fa9a..a131a386baa 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction76.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction76.C
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 // PR c++/90799
 // { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
-// { dg-ice "unify" }
 
 template<class T>
 void foo() noexcept(T::value);

base-commit: f262a3518877ccce9ed41b2e152c3a3564727bd6
-- 
2.29.2


             reply	other threads:[~2021-01-05  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-05  1:31 Marek Polacek [this message]
2021-01-05 16:02 ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210105013118.692897-1-polacek@redhat.com \
    --to=polacek@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).