From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C3A385782D for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 23:15:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org C0C3A385782D Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-172-Dl4UN4d8MpqLDCcgArfm5Q-1; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 18:15:31 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Dl4UN4d8MpqLDCcgArfm5Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7588801965; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 23:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-112-197.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.197]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46C605D736; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 23:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 119NFRou199635 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:15:27 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 119NFPvW199634; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:15:25 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:15:25 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Jason Merrill Cc: Mark Wielaard , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, tom@tromey.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Make sure that static data member constexpr isn't optimized away in test. Message-ID: <20210209231525.GJ3748@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20200824125658.22526-1-mark@klomp.org> <20200824125658.22526-3-mark@klomp.org> <20200824174051.GN2363@tucnak> <55555775-ab76-bbba-ccf8-63684edde2cc@redhat.com> <02d2f197-ea05-79bb-d6e5-c462fa46c59e@redhat.com> <20210209195523.GC4020736@tucnak> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210209195523.GC4020736@tucnak> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 23:15:37 -0000 On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 08:55:26PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 02:40:12PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote: > > For GCC 11, I think let's fix the regression with your (Jakub) earlier > > patch, maybe only for DIEs with DW_AT_const_value. > > Thanks. > Following works too, so I'll test it tonight. The patch fixed not just the expected -FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/constexpr-var-1.C scan-assembler-times DW_AT_const_expr 2 but also -FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/80276.cc whatis p4 -FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/80276.cc whatis p4 -FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as -FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as -FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print os -FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print os Jakub