From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89948386100B for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:02:50 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 89948386100B Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-458-KVHPM2aGN_imNI4vLtb9dw-1; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 06:02:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: KVHPM2aGN_imNI4vLtb9dw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 786FA824F8E; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-115-183.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.183]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E39396A940; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 13KA2fBQ3545535 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:02:41 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 13KA2eTL3545534; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:02:40 +0200 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:02:40 +0200 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Tobias Burnus Cc: Paul Richard Thomas , Tobias Burnus , gcc-patches , "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR100110 - Parameterized Derived Types, problems with global variable Message-ID: <20210420100240.GM1179226@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <52820920-9877-27c5-f3e6-860c30844231@codesourcery.com> <6384ffb3-0a26-2903-eb53-5b375924ee46@mentor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6384ffb3-0a26-2903-eb53-5b375924ee46@mentor.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:02:51 -0000 On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:58:32AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > is there a reason why you did not apply the patch to mainline ('master') > but only to GCC 11 ('releases/gcc-11')? > > While GCC 11 is okay, I had expected it to be (only) on mainline! r11-8255 is before the branchpoint, so is both in GCC 11 and trunk. r11-8256 was the last revision on both, followed by r12-0 on trunk and r11-8257 on releases/gcc-11. Jakub